Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have friends who sing the praises of Rosemead. Apparently it is a very caring independent school for little ones and is particularly enlightened and nurturing with regard to children with special needs. The teaching is supposed to be terrific and it is a really warm environment.

Hi


My children go to Oakfield so I'm a little biased :o) They have been going since nursery (they are now 4 and 6) and they LOVE IT. Nursery is very caring, nurturing and understanding. When you go to the school, you'll see an abundance of kids' artwork all over the walls and happy, well mannered children. This is obviously a good sign!!!


Only until you visit both schools will you get that gut feeling - good luck!


Kim

Hi


My children aren't at Oakfield but we did seriously consider it and from memory, some go to the well known Dulwich schools, Alleyns etc but quite a lot go to St Dunstans (or at least they did in the years we were looking at). I think this information may well be available on the website

  • 1 month later...
My friend's son goes to Rosemead and his nativity play script was 'cause and "oi, get off my tinsel". Nice! Why not teach them proper English and teach them not to talk to people in such a way! Can't say he is polite and no wonder if that's what he is being taught. My children go to a good old state school - mix with all walks of life and learn far more social skills because of it. If you are paying for education it should be very academic as well as teaching them excellent manners. Wouldn't spend money on sending my child there.

Interesting perspective p1f0s - a few of my friends share your views about social skills at a state school. This comment really does make me laugh as private schools are not only full of academics and discipline - the children have wonderful social skills and fun, there are a great mixture of races, it's very family orientated with lots of parents getting involved in the running of the school and of course, they do receive a wonderful education with lots of one-on-one assistance and support. The decision to send my child there was because his speech was delayed and I didn't want him to get overlooked in our local school, he needed a lot of support which he got at Oakfield and still does. However, my friend's child is thriving at their local state school - I would never knock it and, if I were to be in a position where I couldn't afford to send my kids private, I would happily send them to our local school. I consider myself lucky to have the option. Oh, and my children have impeccable manners but this is due to how we raise them! Just like our next door neighbours who go to the local state school - very well mannered young children :D


Our nativity play does not have such a title as "oi, get off my tinsel" but it did make me laugh because why not! It's a play and something fun!

Haven't got a child at either but looked around both and got definite feeling rosemead good for girls but not for boisterous boys, which my son most definitely is - lots of stairs and small rooms, which inevitable means not much space for letting off steam. oakfield nursery - new head told us their USP was that they actively teach their toddlers, which put me right off because I want my children to bumble around and play for as long as possible before formal schooling. But each to their own. Hope this helps you in your decision making, it seems there are many happy parents from both schools.
  • 2 months later...

although you have probably made your decisions by now i felt compelled to respond to one of the comments made above.


i have children at rosemead and i have to say that the comment on rosemead children having bad manners is quite unusual. rosemead are really quite strict and totally intolerant of bad manners, poor behaviour, waiting turns to talk etc. in fact i might even say they don't let children be children in this regard and are a little too prim and proper. from when they start at 3/4 yrs old in nursery there is a very, very high expectation without exception.

it does fall short on facilities/size of classroom (they are small nursery-yr1) but they never fail to impress upon the children the importance of politeness, respecting each other and property, table manners etc. my youngest was holding doors open for us and friends at 3yrs old...i am quite a strict mum too..if rosemead had a shortfall it certainly wouldn't be in the manners department.

education-wise they have been great too..my child was reading at 3yrs..partly down to their methods and our encouragement..but again can't fault that. they stream kids according to ability straight away and really push them along.

i would say it's not as nurturing as they lead you to believe and not the best school for boys...boisterousness is not tolerated AT ALL...which is good but not realistic when it comes to boys.

good luck in your decision making if you have not already decided!

We chose Rosemead because we met some extremely polite children who went there. What Rosemead does is works with the strengths of your children and not against them. They are extremely good at helping you make the right choices for your children both at prep and beyond.


I have both a girl and a boy at the school who are both extremely active and love Rosemead, and participate in a number of before and after school activities arranged at school to let off steam. Rosemead has a strong emphasis on providing dance (ballet, modern, dance and drama) as well as the more traditional sports of football, netball and swimming.


Small class rooms have the advantage that there are less distractions to the task in hand, alot of children feel more secure in a smaller environment.

New info - Oakfield has a new head in the shape of Jane Stevens. (I know of her from friends with children at her previous school, Putney High.) Their view was that they were sorry to see her go, she was well regarded by the parents at PHS, is very committed and will do well for the new place. To be honest, I would not previously have considered Oakfield but will now be keeping an eye on its progress and would not be surprised to see the pupils doing extremely well under her. JAGS could do with some competition round here anyway...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...