Hear me, East Dulwich

[*Bob*]

Sorry to hear about your hunch, Brum. I didn't know.

[DaveR]

"Hear me, East Dulwich" ??

Why would anyone see you as anything other than a complete tw@t?

[*Bob*]

'He' is no tw@t. He.. is The Axeman. And he's here to tell it like it is.

There's a new show in town - you betcha.

[katie1997]

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > and apologise with a zeeeee ?

>

>

> Zed.

>

> Please, please, please. It makes me see reed.

me too B - just wrote it like that cos(z) its the way those words are spelled if using a US spell check.

zat iz all ...

[Keef]

Oh come on everyone, this could be interesting. Must admit though, Mike was my first thought too when I saw the name Axeman.

[katie1997]

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'He' is no tw@t. He.. is The Axeman. And he's here

> to tell it like it is.

>

> There's a new show in town - you betcha.

wonder how long the new show will run for ?

PS. who IS Mike? ;)

[Brendan]

Well fraulein zat iz a relief.

[brum]

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sounds very authorative brum ? you saying this as

> a man who knows or a man with a hunch?

I'm saying this as a man who knows Mike.

Oh, and thanks for spilling about my 'hunch'. Now everyone will recognise me as I lurch up and down Lordship Lane, doing my shopping.

PS - thanks for the sympathy, *Bob*.

[Axeman]

So, would I be correct in assuming that some of you are implying that I'm a reincarnation of a former (unwelcome?) user?

If this is the case, and you're surreptitiously using that as a default excuse to ignore, or dismiss what I claim and opine on as false, then frankly that seems like the cowardly way out.

Is this how you treat all newcomers, even if they've tried to make amends for any indiscretion?

Oh and, *Bob*. You're quite right to point-out that I misspelt 'offence'. But if we're going to be pedantic, there's a 'y' in betchya.

[edcam]

Axeman appears to be one hungry troll. Do not feed him.

[legalbeagle]

I think it is fair to say that this is exactly how the forum will treat any newcomers who are as peculiarly, erm, forthright as you are. You are more than welcome to apologise for misjudging the tone of this forum and being very offensive, and I think Ladymuck was very gracious to accept so quickly. But just as you claim the right to speak so frankly, others have the right to find your apology insincere or simply inadequate.

No one on here asked for a superhero, Axeman, and no one elected you to the post of chief whip. So don't be surprised that you aren't getting a warm welcome.

(Yes Brum sweetie, I know. Sorry.)

[brum]

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>>

> (Yes Brum sweetie, I know. Sorry.)

Forgiven, LB (tu)

[DJKillaQueen]

I think Axeman is jrussel.

[louisiana]

You may be right DJKQ, but I tend to regard one troll-bot the same as another, as they all behave in pretty much the same way. Best to leave them to the rats. B)

[karter]

The Axeman- could be jrussel, could be mike, could be bbw(& the rest)and he has managed to shake you lot up, f**k him i say for he will never break up your friendships. (6)

[RosieH]

No way Axeman's Mike - unless Mike has spent every hour god sends since his unfortunate Nunhead ramblings at the school of spelling and rhetoric and didacticism.

Axeman, you were quite rude, but no ruder I think than some people already on here - so I'm going to go against the flow and not tell you to f@ck off. I think you're right to say there's insincerity on here, but you're wrong to assume that nobody really likes each other - they do - and axe or no, they'll hack you to pieces if you suggest otherwise.

Anyway, for my part, welcome, with one massive caveat. Pronouncing yourself the Chief Whip and talk of "putting the stick about" is the kind of pomposity that suggests you're masturbating furiously in front of both a mirror and your computer screen. So, you know, don't.

[Narnia]

That's one hell of a welcome RH. Who is as rude though?

[Jeremy]

Yes there probably is insincerity on this forum, and I've only ever been to a couple of the forum "socials" because smalltalk with strangers isn't really my bag. So I kind of understand what axeman is on about.

But plenty of people enjoy the drinks, so why criticise? I don't get it.

[RosieH]

Narnia, I got carried away with myself - I should have typed "some" rather than "many". In fact, ahma go back and do that now...

[iaineasy]

he's back. Obviously and no doubt the forum will be a little livelier for it!

hugs as long as your here, but I wouldn't go so far as to say I will miss you once you're banned again.

[karter]

no reason to ban Axeman as far as i can see.

[Ladymuck]

I agree karter. S/he has behaved poorly (but so have others, including myself, in the past - it happens), has apologised, and has been duly reprimanded. Hopefully this has been a learning experience...

[DJKillaQueen]

He is so obviously a troll....why pamper to that?

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree karter. S/he has behaved poorly (but so

> have others, including myself, in the past - it

> happens), has apologised, and has been duly

> reprimanded. Hopefully this has been a learning

> experience...

[karter]

hey sis, and where is daizie, is she still on the ban list too? iaineasy is right though, if it is BBW he does make things more lively in his own unique way. ( Some ppl just have so much time on their hands) :)

[Narnia]

Oh dear Karter and LM. In one sentence you are both telling him to f off and in another there's no reason for him to be banned, it's a learning experience. This person doesn't want to exchange opinions with forumites. He just wants to wind people up. You two have had your happy pills far too early.