Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well, are you? In the sense that you're proud to be British, and aren't afraid of saying it.


Naturally, I assume that there must be quite a few on this forum who aren't British, but fear not, I don't want anyone to feel left-out. So feel free to extend the question to your respective nationalities.


The reason that I ask, is that on walking through my native Crystal Palace during the World Cup, I noted an obvious lack of support in the form of the Union flag. Personally, I can't abide the dull and tacky flag of St George. No, I'm talking about the Union Flag, and all the other flags that reflected the competition of the World Cup.


Why the absence of national pride, and are we less inclined to show public support for our country in this more polite age? Political correctness, disinterest or is it just unfashionable these days. Though I do understand that there are many more ways of showing support for your country, and in that case, how do you go about it?


Personally, I consider myself a patriot and I'm not afraid to display the Union flag openly. Why, I have one in my living-room.


You?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13491-are-you-a-patriot/
Share on other sites

I happen to be Irish. I was born there so had no choice. Proud of being Irish, not really. Glad to be? Yes in the sense that we have things in common that amuse us. I don't have a flag in my sitting room though. As for the Union flag not being displayed during the WC..... as it represents four different 'football' countries, it's hardly surprising.

Axeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Though I do understand that there are many

> more ways of showing support for your country, and

> in that case, how do you go about it?



I expect Brum used an SA80.


I use an SA100. I'm assuming my medals are in the post.

I have mine hoisted on a flagpole in my garden. It is the first object my eyes greet and the last I bid my farewells to at night. Like Brum I too sport my grandfather's bridge coat bearing all his military achievements before marching out the door like a trooper ready for my daily combat... Patriotic enough I should think?

I vote that we form our own EDF Squad and march up and down Lordship Lane, with flags waving and red, white and blue bunting hoisted high above our proud heads. Shopkeepers will wonder where their customers have gone, as the pavements fill with folk keen to get the best view as we swagger passed, singing 'Men of Harlech' at the tops of our voices.


Damn it - my inner-Welshness erupted there for a moment, sorry.


Dress code:

Men - a uniform (any will do) with medals on the left breast.

Women - same as men. And of course, heels are compulsory (hey, this is East Dulwich after all).


What say you?

jalapeno Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm more than happy to display my military prowess

> by way of medals anyday if invited. Count me in, I

> say. Or is there any sinister intention behind all

> that my eyes don't see?



No, your eyes don't deceive you. We are amongst friends here - wear those gongs with pride. Gosh I do miss a good march passed!

I am patriotic in that I am proud of my country (England and Britain) that isnt to say that I am not ashamed of some of the things that my country has done.


I am not jingoistic in that I dont believe that we are superior to all else.


Clearly the flying of the Union Flag during the World Cup would not have been appropriate as it was England in the competition and not "Team GB" - I knew that and I hate the feckin' game.


"Team GB" - I am not a supporter of corporal punishment, but whoever created this should be horse whipped as a cad and a twatter.

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can be exempted from wearing heels LM as long

> as you provide a note from your doctor.


oh this is toooo tempting


I mean, would it be very bad form to link notes from the doctor to the wearing of crocs? would it? ;)


* hides from LM *

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can I lead the 'pink' corps for those out proud

> and patriotic (and where the men wear the heels)?



Yes of course! A parade isn't a parade without one, especially not here in ED where all is free and easy. I'm a size 9.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...