Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Unless I;m having a huge clearout I never ever fill my gree bin and its a rare week when I use more than one black bin bag. I've two kids and we mostly shop at supermarkets so have plenty of packaging. WE do have a lot of recycling and a really big factor is that I compost all non-cooked and meat food waste...I'm happy about two week collection and if I had food waste collection too that'd be even better.

Peckhamgatecrasher said:


"Okay - I've read the leaflet properly now! I can use the large, brown garden bin for food.

That means I have a small, brown food bin and some bags going spare (I've been given 150!)..."


Hang on, my leaflet says I've been provided with 50 compostable food waste bags. Why should you get 150 if I've only got 50 (and I bet if I count them there's only 49!). Is it becuase you come from Peckham? What is this blatent discrimination against East Dulwich residents? I'm going to withhold my council tax until I get 150 bags like you.

I was just thinking, if the bags are to go in with the garden waste, surely they will split, or at least some will. So you will end up with garden waste coated with food, and bins also. In the summer it will stink and be covered with flies.

Marvellous idea.


Crap implementation.


If even peeps on EDF are struggling to know what's going on so soon before the scheme kicks off, there has been a failure in comms.


Looking forward to the end of the pilot and the scheme being extended.

sorry im getting confused now, i took this from the council website....


Food waste will be separated in the kitchen into provided biodegradable bags and then added to the secure garden waste (brown) recycling container. This will be collected weekly.


I still think this would result in split bags over the garden waste, or am i missing something?

How is this confusing?


Because there's actually two. A small brown one to put the blue compostable bag in and then to put the food scaps into. Then take it out and transfer to big brown bin, not the green one, not the blue one and not the blue (non-compostable) bag. Also, no need for the divider in the blue box now because although you've been separating your tins and plastic bottles from your glass bottles and jars for the last three years we were only making fools of you - now simply throw them in all together because we only tipped them into one pile in the first place (pans to shot of Cadbury's Smash type figures laughing holding tummies with legs kicking in air).

Christ on a bike, it's all really, really simple.


Everybody seems to know how to set Sky+ for Strictly, roast a chicken, programme the Satnav, book a holiday on the internet, and read a bus timetable, but when it comes to the council making some dead simple changes it's suddenly too much to ask. "I just don't get it.. we have to do WHAT?!?! Arghh... my brain's exploding with these simple changes.. (BOOM)".


It might not work, but on the 'confusion scale' it must register about 0.1

If you are worried about food spillages, why not use the little bins they have provided for the food stuff and the larger brown bin we currently use for garden waste?


lorna63 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sorry im getting confused now, i took this from

> the council website....

>

> Food waste will be separated in the kitchen into

> provided biodegradable bags and then added to the

> secure garden waste (brown) recycling container.

> This will be collected weekly.

>

> I still think this would result in split bags over

> the garden waste, or am i missing something?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...