Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Don't be too keen to 'knock' bird poo - it may drop from the heavens, but with it comes wild flower etc. seeds, so it is a positive contribution to our environment, unlike other mammalian contributions (I am not going into flying reptile poo benefits).

Happy Cyclist Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Due to the input from ubcleglen and zebedee tring,

> the list has been amended.

>

> 1-dragon poo

> 2-dog poo

> 3-cat poo

> 4-bird poo

> 5-human poo

> 6-fox poo



This thread is swiftly tuning into poo itself....EDF Poo must be at the top...


I have to agree with Zebedee Tring, who would have though complaining about dogs sh!tting on the street would be so controversial....

I support Woodstock. I love other people's dogs, but I hate and resent having to clear up their dog crap left on the pavement outside the house. Toosmart1973 - put your phone number on this thread so I can call you up to do the crap clearing.
I'm still looking for the "minefields", I walk my dog every day around here and haven't seen much and she can sniff them out for sure. Most people are picking up, obviously there are some that don't. I think this thread will have a good run! ☺

turtle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm still looking for the "minefields", I walk my

> dog every day around here and haven't seen much

> and she can sniff them out for sure. Most people

> are picking up, obviously there are some that

> don't. I think this thread will have a good run!

> ☺


I hope you're not poopooing it

Dog duck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> turtle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm still looking for the "minefields", I walk

> my

> > dog every day around here and haven't seen much

> > and she can sniff them out for sure. Most

> people

> > are picking up, obviously there are some that

> > don't. I think this thread will have a good

> run!

> > ☺

>

> I hope you're not poopooing it



Half and half, I'll let you decide which!

Dog crap on pavements, front gardens or anywhere else is disgusting. Absolutely vial. The OP should not have to clean up the crap from someone else's dog, bucket or water or not. And I am sure people that have not paved over their front garden have not left them, so that it may become a dog toilet. Owners need to clean up after their dogs.

woodstock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have no idea. I am doing a public

> service?showing someone clearly committing an

> offence which is punishable with a fine of up to

> ?1,000, and more importantly is deeply

> anti-social. Hopefully if more people posted

> similar pictures then some dog owners might become

> more responsible.

>

> Growlybear Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On a more serious note, are there not issues

> about

> > publishing photographs of someone on a public

> > forum without their knowledge or consent under

> > circumstances such as this?


Hear hear!


I don't know why people are being so mean (but it isn't surprising because people seem to like insulting others for no real reason). Why anyone who doesn't have a dog should be clearing up dogs mess (which should be cleared up by the dog owner) is bizarre to me; whether it's 7 seconds or not! and it's nasty!


Dog owners should be responsible!!

turtle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think owners who leave dog mess in the

> street are going to volunteer for this type of

> scheme. Think I'll poo poo that one!


The idea, as it says at the end of the article, is that it eliminates the responsible owners so they can start targeting the irresponsible ones...anyway, why not make it compulsory, now microchipping is compulsory, take a DNA sample at the same time? I know there's a town in Spain which made it compulsory and fined anyone whose dog's mierda was found in the street - virtually 100% eradicated it.

Even the "good" dog owners - the one that scoop the poop - aren't always totally good. Some leave the bags of canine cack on top of the special bins, too lazy to lift the lid. This is exactly what happens on Ryedale, Dunstan's Road end.

No excuse for letting a dog shit on the pavement (or street).

Once you've walked it into your house and up your stairs and tried to clean the stinking mess you may be less inclined to think it's 'no big deal'. That holds only if no-one treads in it.

Zebedee's input (above) is worth looking at too.

This wouldn't qualify as "good" though.


Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even the "good" dog owners - the one that scoop

> the poop - aren't always totally good. Some leave

> the bags of canine cack on top of the special

> bins, too lazy to lift the lid. This is exactly

> what happens on Ryedale, Dunstan's Road end.

Mildly interestingly, to me at least, if your CCTV covers people on the street then you could be in breach of the Data Protection Act. Maybe doesn't apply to dogs though.


https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/cctv


If your camera covers, even partially, any areas beyond the boundaries of your property, such as neighbouring gardens or the street, then it will no longer be exempt from the Data Protection Act (DPA) under the domestic purposes exemption. This does not mean that you are breaching the DPA but it does mean that you might need to take some steps to comply with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
    • That was one that the BBC seem to have lost track of.  But they do still have quite a few. These are some in their 60s archive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0028zp6
    • Hi Trinidad. Have just messaged you about a facebook post...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...