Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is it just me, or is this campaign by the council to encourage recycling a touch over the top?


First I was amazed at the leaflet that came round last month with the "We can do this the easy way" or "We can do this the hard way" message.


And THEN at 08.37 this morning a leaflet was put through my door which said " We notice your blue bag/box was not presented today" followed by other stuff and ending with "you may be fined ?75 if you do not recycle".


This was delivered, hours before the recycling collection people came. I was incensed. I am an avid recycler and composter. In fact the person who delivered this note this morning had had to move the brown bin in order to get past it to get to the door.


I rang the council and left a resonably polite message saying that I really feel that the tone of their recycling leaflets is not good.


Thanks for the opportunity to rant.


Angry of East Dulwich

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1410-heavy-handed-recycling-policy/
Share on other sites

We had the same thing but with a letter addressed to us personally saying they had checked us on several occasions and found us not to be recycling. We always recycle, in fact only the week before I had hounded southwark enviromental services because they had missed our collection. I can only think that in our case that they're not looking by our side gate where we have been told to leave the refuse/recycling. we've also tried to call the helpline number to complain but have been told that they are experiencing high call volumes and will call back before the 24th September.

I was hopping mad about it yesterday but have chilled out somewhat today...

chuff

You can always get your own back by demanding a collection service to recycle the old highly toxic, mercury filled, eco-bulbs that they give away to everyone. They don't seem to be aware of how toxic these bulbs are how they should be disposed of.

>>And THEN at 08.37 this morning a leaflet was put through my door which said " We notice your blue bag/box was not >>presented today" followed by other stuff and ending with "you may be fined ?75 if you do not recycle".


>>This was delivered, hours before the recycling collection people came. I was incensed. I am an avid recycler and >>composter. In <<


Then their leaflet was unquestionably a libel and perhaps you should write back pointing this out, and promising to pass on any similarly libellous literature to your solicitor....The leaflet was not inside a window envelope I suppose? :))

Is everyone getting this? I've not had anyting yet (although I do recycle and leave my box full of beer cans and wine bottles outside the house at all times).


Have they the power to fine? Is a bye law passed stating that we must recycle?


What if I do all my recycling at Sainsburys which is next door to my house? How do they know this?


Sounds like a load of BS to me!

Yes. Start buying stuff, you filthy non-consumerist. ;)


I haven't had any of these leaflets yet, and like ratty our recycling also lives outside in full view. If that is the criteria* they're using when they decide weather or not to leaflet a house then it's a pretty shabby one.



* criterion? can I be bothered to properly singularise? hmm...

ratty Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------->

> Have they the power to fine? Is a bye law passed

> stating that we must recycle?


Short answer is yes, they can require that you recycle. However, they can't fine you if you don't have any recycling to put out, or if you recycle it elsewhere.


The longer answer is that the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (as amended by the London Local Authorities Act 2007) gives local authorities the power to specify how people separate their waste, e.g. which bin it should be placed in as well as which days it will be collected. It also provides for fixed penalty charges if people breach certain provisions of the Act. One of the sections you can be fined for breaching is section 46 (thrillingly entitled "Receptacles for Household Waste").


Section 46 allows Southwark to require us to use separate containers for recyclable waste, subject to certain conditions such as the number of containers and requirements for separation of waste must be reasonable. If you breach this section, for example by mixing recyclable and non-recyclable waste, you could in theory be liable to a penalty charge. However, if you don't have any recycling to put out, or recycle elsewhere, the penalty charge certainly couldn't apply.


There has been huge amount of discussion about how Councils should use these powers. Councils say the threat of fines are essential to get through to those people who do no recyling at all. However, there are very limited guidelines as to how these powers should be applied, and a wide variation in practice between councils. See the various news stories about on the spot littering for a similar discussion.


I have no connection to Southwark Council by the way, but take a keen personal and professional interest in civil liberties, if I can put it like that. This is a good example of the type of regulation that simply didn't exist 10 years ago, where there is potential for summary conviction, no requirement for a common sense application and only limited grounds for appeal.

One thing I forgot to mention, in fairness to Southwark Council, is that part of the reason they may be being a bit heavy handed, is that their waste management strategy doesn't involve building a big old incinerator to treat waste, as a number of councils are.


The strategy only works, however, if Southwark hit fairly ambitious targets for recycling. If they were being a bit more relaxed about the recyling and going down the incinerator route, I suspect people would be just as aggravated for different reasons.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>And THEN at 08.37 this morning a leaflet was put

> through my door which said " We notice your blue

> bag/box was not >>presented today" followed by

> other stuff and ending with "you may be fined ?75

> if you do not recycle".

>

> >>This was delivered, hours before the recycling

> collection people came. I was incensed. I am an

> avid recycler and >>composter. In

> Then their leaflet was unquestionably a libel and

> perhaps you should write back pointing this out,

> and promising to pass on any similarly libellous

> literature to your solicitor....The leaflet was

> not inside a window envelope I suppose? :))


Um, what?



Charlie

Few weeks ago we have had our brown bin and our blue bag nicked. We are still waiting for the council to replace them. They were supposed to deliver them early last week but they haven't turned up yet.


So until they get replaced there is a bit of a dilemma as it seems the recycling collection people won't take things if they are not in the dedicated container -- should we be stop recycling until we get provided the right containers?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...