Jump to content

Fences on East Dulwich Estate -Dog Kennel Hill (Another history one!)


Recommended Posts

This is one that always has me thinking whenever I walk down Quorn or Pytchley Roads!


I heard years ago that the black metal fencing on the estate was made from recycled stretchers from one of the world wars? I know the estate was built in the 30's but not sure if the fences have been there as long as that.


If you look at the shape of most of them, they do look like stretchers but it could be someones over active imagination!


Anyone know if there's any truth in this one?


Vicki

they certainly are stretchers, they were mentioned in an article in the es magazine about 10 years ago ,if you take the time to look carefully at them you will certainly be able to see this quite clearly,some of them have a curved underside which i presume was to raise them off the ground while others dont which i presume was to enable to slide them into the back of ambulances and other vehicles. they dont look very comfortable but mind you if you had a leg or an arm missing a comfortable stretcher was probably the last thing on your mind. the said same article also mentioned the number of uxbs scattered sround the area the most prominent one being on the site at kch, and finally it also mentioned about the air-raid shelters which were built under camberwell green, co-incidentally these were only filled in a few years ago after one of them partially collapsed.

My understanding is that this is an urban myth started by getting the cart before the horse.


These fences were designed and erected in the 60s and 70s to be used as stretchers in time of emergency, either fire or civil defence. This was a product of the same paranoia that created the much loved Protect and Survive.


Metal was scarce in both WW1 and WW2, and stretchers were made of wood and canvas with leather buckles and metal clips.


If you look closely at the 'stretchers' you will see that the thechnology in the mesh, the extruded tubes and the welding is much more modern.


The need to have a ready supply of stretchers near blocks of flats has IIRC been superceded by developments in the fire service, who now have inflatable slides like those fitted to airliners.


Of course I stand to be corrected on all of this; I was having precisely the same conversation with a chum of mine in lovely SE5 just last week, probably the same ones as you, ratty.


Ultraconsultancy

Thanks for that all!


I was reading somewhere recently about the Shelters at the green, they are putting some sort of memorial there for an entire wedding party that were killed when one of those shelters took a direct hit. Another awfully sad war story.


Does anyone know if the sheters on the DKH estate were ever filled in?

  • 1 year later...

Just come across this forum.


My Grandparents lived in Petworth House for 20 odd years and I went to DKH School, many moons ago.


There used to be an air raid shelter in the square, next a small green and bike sheds.


Between the estates there were air raid shelters all the way up the hill.


The corner of Bromar road was a bomb ruin and there was alot of damage opposite the school at the top of the hill.


We used it as a playground, slipping through the corrugated iron fence.


This is going back to the early 60's.


Opposite the estate across DKH was a cricket field and more bomb damaged area.


The stretcher fences were there when I was growing up, I remember them well and have photos somewhere I imagine.


I have not been back into the square for at least 25 years.

The shelter inside the square was immediately as you went through the second arch in on the left travelling from DKH along Pytchley Road and was a standard Surface Public Air Raid Shelter made of brick with a concrete slab roof.


Those in between the estates on the green (as we used to call it) were submerged except for a two tier stucture, again brick with concrete roofs.


The surface shelters were rarely used by people as they were not particularly safe, the concrete roof was in one piece and fell in if hit.


Theses shelters were designed for about 50 people.


I do not recall more shelters in the other estates, but there may have been.


The most prevalent means of protection were trench shelters dug in the parks, which were boarded or concrete lined.


For example the one in Kennington Park, which suffered a tragedy in which 104 people were killed, only about 40 were recovered, the rest are still under the park.


One of my American colleagues is interested in the Blitz/V weapons and I was discussing growing up in an area of London, which was still not, by any means, fully rebuilt from the damage caused by war.


And I was 5 in 1963 when I went to DKH, and the area was a playground paradise of bomb ruins.


Both my Grandfathers served in the First War and were ARP Wardens in the area throughout the Second and had some rather ghoulish stories of those times too!!

santerne that's great local anecdotes. a neighbour of mine (i live right next to the bromar road junction with ivnahoe) told me about the last house on the terrace of old shops on ivanhoe and how it was called 'fire' house for ages as the kids would go set fire to it when they were bored. it's now been replaced...


all the bomb hits you describe tally perfectly with the new builds that scatter that stretch around and down from the estate. funnily enough all the victorian housing stock is surviving well but the post war blocks are suffering or part destroyed...

I know the row of shops you mean.


There used to be an old time shoe repair shop in that row and a Greengrocers, we called Veezies (no idea why, but grew up doing it).


I do know that my Mother left me outside that shop in my pram and went home, only for my Grandmother to ask where I was, as she had me with her when she left.


So slight panic, but it was 1958/9, and things were a little different!


I seem to recall there being a betting office nearby too, it was called Gus Ashe, I think it was bought out by Mecca subsequently.

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

I lived in Southdown House during my childhood and the room I slept in was visited by a young ghost in uniform who used to walk straight out to the bomb shelters. I asked my dad about it and he said it was the ghost of a young man heading to the shleter that got a direct hit. on the green by Southdown House were two shelters - the first was intact and we used to play on top of it. The second, further up the green, was just the remains of the solid roof poking out from the ground - everything and everyone in it were just buried. I, too, used to play on that bomb site on the corner near the shops.We used to have bonfire night there and the fire brigade out every year.

Southdown House was demolised long ago and the 'bombsite' on the corner of Ivanhoe and Bromar is now flats, not sure if you're still around here so thought you might like to know!


I'm on Ivanhoe so if anyone wants me to take some piccies of how it is now I'd be happy to!

The flats on the corner are derelict and bricked up. The council are trying to sell the site to a developer, apparently there are plans for a mixture of townhouses and flats - according to the guy from the council who knocked on my door a couple of months ago.

That's the other corner I think! I was under the assuption that the bombsite house was what is now the flats and the end of the terrace?


I thought that was sold already? I remember seeing a request for planning permission a good few years back for a 5 storey block there, can't remember if it was ever approved though, anyway there are pigeons living in the roof now so they can't demolish it!

Well, the chap from the council told me they didn't have a buyer yet. Although it is possible he was making it up on the spot! I'm keen for them to do something with it, as it's right opposite my house.


Since when were we not allowed to demolish a building just because of pigeons? When mice or squirrels are nesting in a property people they get exterminated, not sure why pigeons should be different!

grahambull Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I remember the betting shop like it was yesterday!

> Kids used to hang about outside trying to get

> adults to put on bets for 'em.



Before the betting office, there used to be bookies on Ivanhoe Road with lookouts on the corners.


My Grandfather used to get my aunt to put his bets on.


She used to get a slip of paper with his shilling bet and his code which she still remembers as OCON1.


I was searching the grey matter for the name of the shop on Pytchley Road, and recaled it just now, it was Thorneycrofts and they had a Boxer called Ming.


And the top green we used to call the Rosie Green.


Incredible what the memory drags back to the surface.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...