Jump to content

How important is physical attraction in a relationship?


Recommended Posts

There's a fine line between love and hate.


Familiarity breeds contempt.


I don't think physical attraction can somehow grow if there wasn't anything there in the first place.

Thankfully physical attraction means different things to different people.


Is this more about 'love at first sight' and people that are in relationships for the sake of it?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The whole "type" thing is bollocks.

>

> I'm not sure - I like girls who look like my Mum.


Caligula Mac?

sexually attraction and desire is very important in a relationship and whilst it is not the most important thing, I have always seen it as the glue that binds the other stuff together. Fortunately the things that people find attractive and sexy are diverse (I have a hopeless weakness for glasses, nice hands and forearms, oh and slightly crooked bottom teeth...). But despite the importance of finding someone attractive, I have never ended a relationship because of not finding someone attractive, its usually that they are selfish or just not funny so it must be the other attributes which are more fundamental.

waynetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course physical attraction is important. Why

> else would she be with him ?

>

> http://blog.mtvasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12

> /2067054.jpg



Lol.....you cannot see the large wad of money in his pocket and his wallet full of no limit credit cards!

thats sex appeal!

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who was it that said 'all women should have an OFF

> switch'?

>

> ( oh, might have been my ex...) (6)



I say That's harsh.... but no mention of the ON switch Katie... did he not know how to turn you :-$n


What a bounder

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's not as important as big knockers.



I say


Quite agree


big brass ones to make it easier for the milkman or other tradesmen to announce their arrival at your door

Very funny MrT! Incidentally I once heard a male gigolo explain that in order to 'perform' with his lady clients of all ages and physical appearance, he would always find at least one attractive thing upon which to focus.... nice eyes, nice hair, the shape of her thigh and so on. It goes to show that there is beauty in everyone if you are prepared to look. So, physical attraction is important in a relationship, but problems can arise if the other person doesn't look hard enough to see it.
Physical attraction comes in all, shape and sizes but I have to agree with Lol it is the money you find in the celebrities world rich old men attract younger women very few go out with a women there own age I personally would not date a man shorter than myself as I feel is if I am forcing him.

Terry Thomas esq Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I say That's harsh.... but no mention of the ON

> switch Katie... did he not know how to turn you

> :-$n

>

> What a bounder


Tel, there's a lot of bounders out there, or so I hear, I'm sure you could teach them a thing or two :)

katie1997 Wrote:

>

> Tel, there's a lot of bounders out there, or so I

> hear, I'm sure you could teach them a thing or two

> :)


My Dear Katie


As much as I could teach them about etiquete and impressing the ladies, I would prefer to teach you a few things


Bottle of Champage during your first lesson my dear? of course you will

From the Beeb:


Professor Robin Dunbar of Liverpool University spent much of the latter half of the 1990s studying the hidden evolutionary signals contained in Lonely Hearts advertisements.


Dunbar found that the vast majority of words used by people to describe themselves in ads could be lumped into five different categories.


He asked 200 university students to rate the appeal of ads containing different categories of words. When Dunbar analysed the results, he found that men and women attached very different levels of importance to the five categories:


Men's preferences

1. Attractiveness

1. Commitment

3. Social Skills

4. Resources

4. Sexiness


Women's preferences

1. Commitment

2. Social Skills

3. Resources

4. Attractiveness

5. Sexiness


Far from being conditioned to regard these things as important, Dunbar argued that men and women had evolved these preferences over millions of years of evolution. These were crucial qualities that enhanced the fitness of children, and, lest we forget, children are the key to the survival of our species.


What hidden messages do we send the opposite sex?


Pregnancy and breast-feeding place great stress on a mother, so females make the biggest investment in reproduction. This is why women are choosier about their partners than men, with 20-something women being the choosiest of all.


This big parental investment also explains why women seek males who are willing to stick around and provide for children


However, when the desire for reproduction is taken out of the equation, preferences change drastically. Dunbar has shown that lesbians were three times less likely to seek resources than heterosexual women.


For males, time spent providing for a pregnant partner could be better spent fathering other children with other women. This may explain why men place such a high premium on attractiveness.


Attractiveness is a rough indicator of age, and in women, age is a good indicator of fertility. After her late 20s, a woman's fertility steadily declines, and so does her value on the dating market.


However, asked to choose one woman as a long-term partner, all three groups chose the beautiful woman regardless of what age they thought she was.


"They are saying: 'I'd rather risk a relationship with an older woman who is not going to give me as many children but is very beautiful, than a woman who is more fecund but whose children will be plainer," says Fieldman.


The theory is based on the notion that a beautiful woman is more likely to bear beautiful offspring and that those offspring will be more successful than plainer offspring.


So I guess that whether physical attraction is important in a relationship depends entirely on what you want out of the relationship.


Without a doubt it's got to be important in the 'lust' stage, but it probably gets a lower priority in the 'attraction' and 'attachment' phases


If your overall priorities are resources or commitment, then you may not need to go through the 'lust' stage at all - thus negating the necessity for physical attraction.

dita-on-tees Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think my relationships would be easier if I had

> a mute switch.



Most men have these inbuilt. Its when you can listen to what your wife says and watch sport at the same time, nodding occaisionally.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dita-on-tees Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think my relationships would be easier if I

> had

> > a mute switch.

>

>

> Most men have these inbuilt. Its when you can

> listen to what your wife says and watch sport at

> the same time, nodding occaisionally.



So you men can multi-task after all!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...