Jump to content

How important is physical attraction in a relationship?


Recommended Posts

There's a fine line between love and hate.


Familiarity breeds contempt.


I don't think physical attraction can somehow grow if there wasn't anything there in the first place.

Thankfully physical attraction means different things to different people.


Is this more about 'love at first sight' and people that are in relationships for the sake of it?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The whole "type" thing is bollocks.

>

> I'm not sure - I like girls who look like my Mum.


Caligula Mac?

sexually attraction and desire is very important in a relationship and whilst it is not the most important thing, I have always seen it as the glue that binds the other stuff together. Fortunately the things that people find attractive and sexy are diverse (I have a hopeless weakness for glasses, nice hands and forearms, oh and slightly crooked bottom teeth...). But despite the importance of finding someone attractive, I have never ended a relationship because of not finding someone attractive, its usually that they are selfish or just not funny so it must be the other attributes which are more fundamental.

waynetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course physical attraction is important. Why

> else would she be with him ?

>

> http://blog.mtvasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12

> /2067054.jpg



Lol.....you cannot see the large wad of money in his pocket and his wallet full of no limit credit cards!

thats sex appeal!

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Who was it that said 'all women should have an OFF

> switch'?

>

> ( oh, might have been my ex...) (6)



I say That's harsh.... but no mention of the ON switch Katie... did he not know how to turn you :-$n


What a bounder

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's not as important as big knockers.



I say


Quite agree


big brass ones to make it easier for the milkman or other tradesmen to announce their arrival at your door

Very funny MrT! Incidentally I once heard a male gigolo explain that in order to 'perform' with his lady clients of all ages and physical appearance, he would always find at least one attractive thing upon which to focus.... nice eyes, nice hair, the shape of her thigh and so on. It goes to show that there is beauty in everyone if you are prepared to look. So, physical attraction is important in a relationship, but problems can arise if the other person doesn't look hard enough to see it.
Physical attraction comes in all, shape and sizes but I have to agree with Lol it is the money you find in the celebrities world rich old men attract younger women very few go out with a women there own age I personally would not date a man shorter than myself as I feel is if I am forcing him.

Terry Thomas esq Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I say That's harsh.... but no mention of the ON

> switch Katie... did he not know how to turn you

> :-$n

>

> What a bounder


Tel, there's a lot of bounders out there, or so I hear, I'm sure you could teach them a thing or two :)

katie1997 Wrote:

>

> Tel, there's a lot of bounders out there, or so I

> hear, I'm sure you could teach them a thing or two

> :)


My Dear Katie


As much as I could teach them about etiquete and impressing the ladies, I would prefer to teach you a few things


Bottle of Champage during your first lesson my dear? of course you will

From the Beeb:


Professor Robin Dunbar of Liverpool University spent much of the latter half of the 1990s studying the hidden evolutionary signals contained in Lonely Hearts advertisements.


Dunbar found that the vast majority of words used by people to describe themselves in ads could be lumped into five different categories.


He asked 200 university students to rate the appeal of ads containing different categories of words. When Dunbar analysed the results, he found that men and women attached very different levels of importance to the five categories:


Men's preferences

1. Attractiveness

1. Commitment

3. Social Skills

4. Resources

4. Sexiness


Women's preferences

1. Commitment

2. Social Skills

3. Resources

4. Attractiveness

5. Sexiness


Far from being conditioned to regard these things as important, Dunbar argued that men and women had evolved these preferences over millions of years of evolution. These were crucial qualities that enhanced the fitness of children, and, lest we forget, children are the key to the survival of our species.


What hidden messages do we send the opposite sex?


Pregnancy and breast-feeding place great stress on a mother, so females make the biggest investment in reproduction. This is why women are choosier about their partners than men, with 20-something women being the choosiest of all.


This big parental investment also explains why women seek males who are willing to stick around and provide for children


However, when the desire for reproduction is taken out of the equation, preferences change drastically. Dunbar has shown that lesbians were three times less likely to seek resources than heterosexual women.


For males, time spent providing for a pregnant partner could be better spent fathering other children with other women. This may explain why men place such a high premium on attractiveness.


Attractiveness is a rough indicator of age, and in women, age is a good indicator of fertility. After her late 20s, a woman's fertility steadily declines, and so does her value on the dating market.


However, asked to choose one woman as a long-term partner, all three groups chose the beautiful woman regardless of what age they thought she was.


"They are saying: 'I'd rather risk a relationship with an older woman who is not going to give me as many children but is very beautiful, than a woman who is more fecund but whose children will be plainer," says Fieldman.


The theory is based on the notion that a beautiful woman is more likely to bear beautiful offspring and that those offspring will be more successful than plainer offspring.


So I guess that whether physical attraction is important in a relationship depends entirely on what you want out of the relationship.


Without a doubt it's got to be important in the 'lust' stage, but it probably gets a lower priority in the 'attraction' and 'attachment' phases


If your overall priorities are resources or commitment, then you may not need to go through the 'lust' stage at all - thus negating the necessity for physical attraction.

dita-on-tees Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think my relationships would be easier if I had

> a mute switch.



Most men have these inbuilt. Its when you can listen to what your wife says and watch sport at the same time, nodding occaisionally.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dita-on-tees Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think my relationships would be easier if I

> had

> > a mute switch.

>

>

> Most men have these inbuilt. Its when you can

> listen to what your wife says and watch sport at

> the same time, nodding occaisionally.



So you men can multi-task after all!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd reread what you posted and try to summarise.  It just comes across as a rant.
    • Just shows, to me, once proud to be a citizen of UK.. now.. well if we pay/contribute to services - nhs, police, fire etc and folk who have made this there home - no matter what creed or culture.. for the love c of God, can someone  please explain to me.. how we have working royals who like them or not, have tried and continue to actually support and make a change and then we have Andrew.. who just destroys everything.. not just him, or royalty but his own children..  I had great admiration for The Queen - and respect.. as have a huge number of people.. but.. these old traditions where gosh.. live rent free and can’t get chucked out until I believe 2070? From what I scanned..well he has and continues to have it all.. has to go thru what old rules? Etc.  doubt very much he has even kept the upkeep maintenance up on his abode.. and do the shite keeps on pulling up.. What has Andrew done for UK or for that matter since he was 20?? Do please tell me       Totally off topic, before anyone jumps down my throat.. I just do not get how anyone is proud to be British at this point in time. Whoever is in power, seems to be able to help themselves to the public purse with no redress at all - Covid is a great example of lining of pockets.. Millions  given to Rowanda, so one is led to believe, to help with refugee problem and one can’t get a plane load off!  I simply do not get it at all. Use of food banks in UK growing yearly, homeless as well, nhs, police, fire service etc all on their knees..        
    • Have applied the green roof at a number of properties and no issues you are concerned about detected. Have issues with cats defecating in the vicinity, however, they are not selecting the green roof specifically. Use decent compost, slow release fertiliser specific for green roofs, and lay it methodically not leaving blank patches. It looks amazing when cared for and adds value.  
    • Some suggestions for mandatory action might include:- 1. Permit retailers to display facial images on the premises  of previous offenders at their local store. 2. Sound an alert and display images on screens inside the store when the FR flags up a person entering who is on the national database of shoplifters. 3. Physically bar recognised shoplifters from the premises. Should they attempt to force entry then charges should be pressed under aggravated trespass, which  a criminal offence under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. 4. Change the law to allow retailers to have enhanced powers of citizens arrest. What would you suggest? The UK seems to have the most lenient policy towards shoplifting , probably because of other demands on the police force. On the plus side, they may have more time for it now that non-crime hate incidents will no longer be investigated. Other countries, such as the USA have much more sever punishment as does Singapore where repeat offenders or aggravated cases can be sentenced to up to 3 years in prison, a fine, or both.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...