Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Statistics for you Hugo:


75% of men and 29% of women always have orgasms with their partner (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, Michaels, 1994).


About 85% of men report that their partner had an orgasm at the most recent sexual event; this compares to the 64% of women who report having had an orgasm at their most recent sexual event. (A difference that is too large to be accounted for by some of the men having had male partners at their most recent event.) (NSSHB, 2010.)


Hugo - is your wife one of the ones who fake it??

Sorry, but earlier you said


The fact that the majority of women have never experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in my opinion.


Icould be missing the point, but I don't see how that is backed up in any way, by the stats you've just posted.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but earlier you said

>

> The fact that the majority of women have never

> experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly

> discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in

> my opinion.

>

> Icould be missing the point, but I don't see how

> that is backed up in any way, by the stats you've

> just posted.



Yes, sorry, maybe I should have said a large minority of women have not experienced an orgasm. I think it used to be a majority in the dim and distant past, but seems that things have improved somewhat.


Only 64% of women having orgasms is not good though.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I pretty much agree with you GG... BUT,

> this is a slightly different level of discussion

> to a thread on cricket. There are seperate forums

> for this sort of thing you know ;-)



Exactly Keef. Once you get into discussing what content is acceptable for the forum and what isn't then it comes down to censorship. I can't see anybody being in a hurry to grasp that nettle. Frankly, there's nothing on this thread that has disturbed me, whereas some of the content on the various joke threads has left me dumbstruck before now.

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Captain Scarlet Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I am not pretending to be coy at all..in fact I

> am

> > a dirty barstard myself I freely admit it

>

> Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!

>

> I haven't been offended by anything on this

> thread. I will admit to being a bit shocked

> though. Not at the content, but at the context

> more than anything else.


Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!>>Fireman!

No offence taken..

I just hope I have not offended anybody...I was hoping everyone on the forum was open minded?.

Well the only stats I've seen are IV's own. They seem to show her rah rah right on rant was a loadee of oldee bolloxee.


I can't see that helping much when you're down the pub complaining about how hard done by you are, but hell, maybe you're complaining because it's a bonding thing, rather than because its true.

Is he still at it?


I don't recall any conversations with female friends on being hard done by...but yes we could have a very long dicussion of how much women had to do over the last 100 years to get to that place of semi-equality. In fact the only conversations I have with women in the pub are ones that involve us all having a good laugh (because laughter is good for the soul)...something dear H you are obviously desperately in need of....


It seems to me H your issue here is that a group of women are having a conversation about an item that mostly women use. Even worse we are having fun with that conversation as too are the men (apart form you) that have posted. Would you be as indignant if we were discussing the best brand of tampon to use for example....? Probably yes. But it doesn't mean because YOU can not handle it that no-one else should discuss it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry but I think it's best if people just check things for themselves when they buy things. In three shops/restaurants (from some years back) I just avoid the places concerned, as in all three  cases I was pretty sure it wasn't a genuine mistake, and in one place  it happened more than once and usually late at night.
    • Sorry Sue - me again. This has been on my mind all day, it's a big bug bear of mine. If you don't mind - please can you private message me some of these shops so I can cross reference / add to my AVOID list.  Thanks in advance. Let's make sure this doesn't happen this Christmas, particularly as we head into sales season. Even more problematic in my experience.
    • Pity you didn't quote what you are referring to, Mal. I didn't see the previous post, and my mind is boggling 😮
    • The Cherry Tree was absolutely excellent for a while when a youngish couple ran it and brought in a really good chef. It was them who renamed it The Cherry Tree. They were really turning it around. The chef did fantastic Scotch eggs, and one of the best roasts I've ever had. If memory serves the then owner,  for some reason known only to himself, took a dislike to them and what they were doing and sacked them all. And yes we weren't expecting a top class  meal last Christmas, and we left it too late to book anywhere else, but we weren't expecting it for a hundred pounds EACH to be quite as terrible as it was. Stupid us. Not sure why you are confused by my post, Jazzer? Did I misremember? Now it's got even more confusing because my posts have been merged and your confused emoji is shown at the bottom of the second one instead of the first 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...