Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Statistics for you Hugo:


75% of men and 29% of women always have orgasms with their partner (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, Michaels, 1994).


About 85% of men report that their partner had an orgasm at the most recent sexual event; this compares to the 64% of women who report having had an orgasm at their most recent sexual event. (A difference that is too large to be accounted for by some of the men having had male partners at their most recent event.) (NSSHB, 2010.)


Hugo - is your wife one of the ones who fake it??

Sorry, but earlier you said


The fact that the majority of women have never experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in my opinion.


Icould be missing the point, but I don't see how that is backed up in any way, by the stats you've just posted.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but earlier you said

>

> The fact that the majority of women have never

> experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly

> discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in

> my opinion.

>

> Icould be missing the point, but I don't see how

> that is backed up in any way, by the stats you've

> just posted.



Yes, sorry, maybe I should have said a large minority of women have not experienced an orgasm. I think it used to be a majority in the dim and distant past, but seems that things have improved somewhat.


Only 64% of women having orgasms is not good though.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I pretty much agree with you GG... BUT,

> this is a slightly different level of discussion

> to a thread on cricket. There are seperate forums

> for this sort of thing you know ;-)



Exactly Keef. Once you get into discussing what content is acceptable for the forum and what isn't then it comes down to censorship. I can't see anybody being in a hurry to grasp that nettle. Frankly, there's nothing on this thread that has disturbed me, whereas some of the content on the various joke threads has left me dumbstruck before now.

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Captain Scarlet Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I am not pretending to be coy at all..in fact I

> am

> > a dirty barstard myself I freely admit it

>

> Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!

>

> I haven't been offended by anything on this

> thread. I will admit to being a bit shocked

> though. Not at the content, but at the context

> more than anything else.


Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!>>Fireman!

No offence taken..

I just hope I have not offended anybody...I was hoping everyone on the forum was open minded?.

Well the only stats I've seen are IV's own. They seem to show her rah rah right on rant was a loadee of oldee bolloxee.


I can't see that helping much when you're down the pub complaining about how hard done by you are, but hell, maybe you're complaining because it's a bonding thing, rather than because its true.

Is he still at it?


I don't recall any conversations with female friends on being hard done by...but yes we could have a very long dicussion of how much women had to do over the last 100 years to get to that place of semi-equality. In fact the only conversations I have with women in the pub are ones that involve us all having a good laugh (because laughter is good for the soul)...something dear H you are obviously desperately in need of....


It seems to me H your issue here is that a group of women are having a conversation about an item that mostly women use. Even worse we are having fun with that conversation as too are the men (apart form you) that have posted. Would you be as indignant if we were discussing the best brand of tampon to use for example....? Probably yes. But it doesn't mean because YOU can not handle it that no-one else should discuss it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...