Jump to content

World Cup decision ??

Mick Mac

By Mick Mac
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Assuming England qualify for 2022, how is the beer

> bellied England football hooligan meant to quench

> his thirst in 100F+ heat when booze is banned!!??


Booze isn't banned from what I've read.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can someone explain to me what is so wrong about

> spreading football to non-footballing countries?


It's a spectator sport. You'd hope some turn up, those who have paid for their tickets legally through the proper channels and not those given freebies from FIFA.


>

> Apart from anything else qatar is now going to

> come under international scrutiny about their

> human rights record. Expect to see improvements

> there.


Yes let's hope so.

SeanMacGabhann

SeanMacGabhann

Posted
Posted

Build it and they will come



No question shenanigans were involved but I don't see why people think England wouldn't have been involved in those as well. Watching the news is embarrassing "what now for English football?". As if a country needs a world cup to crack on and improve

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

It doesn't seem very fair, but I guess if your media establishment spend 3 months tearing into corruption at FIFA you're not going to make an awful lot of friends.


I wonder who the single supporter was?


I didn't really expect us to win it, I thought that it would probably be Russia. The reasons you'd vote for England is for the existing facilities, the sporting heritage and the money. It's clear from these votes that the actual criteria for judging was the creation of new facilities, expanding the sport's support base to new audiences, and that cash revenue took a back seat.


In some sense a vote for Russia and Qatar is a vote for a new future, a vote for England is about languishing complacently in the past.

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted

Apparently Cameroon was the other England vote.


Where is the legacy is taking a World Cup to Qatar when they are going to dismantle the stadia and take it to countries that do have a heartbeat for football? Zero culture for football, zero people to fill the grounds, anything but zero money now in the pockets of those who take bribes. Would it have been so bad to have given it to Oz?


If it's all about human rights being cleaned up why don't they just pass it around the whole middle east every 4 years?


I say stuff FIFA and let's get on with PL and CL football!

SCSB79

SCSB79

Posted
Posted

"The laws of Qatar tolerate alcohol to a certain extent. However, the few bars and nightclubs in Qatar operate only in expensive hotels and clubs, much Distribution Company, the only importer and retailer for alcohol in Qatar. Under Qatar's Sharia, it is illegal to show alcohol or be drunk in public."


Source: wikipedia.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • CP_ED
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By CP_ED · Posted

      Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • teddyboy23
      New Empanada Place on LL

      By teddyboy23 · Posted

      The lady is called Janet 
    • FellbriggSam
      Tree Killer – Seeking Advice on Dealing with Toxic Neighbours

      By FellbriggSam · Posted

      He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • geh
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By geh · Posted

      I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...