Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Brought to my attention by SNARL, this was tweeted by the twitter account of the Perryvale bar in response to a tweet about the cat serial killer: 'it's just a cat...#pussybashing They taste great with a pinot grigio !!' I can't believe that a respectable company (which also runs the Crooked Well) would tweet something like this, it's in extremely poor taste and I for one will boycott both the Perryvale and the Crooked Well.


(Title changed by Admin)

So what did they think the original tweet would do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I am calling out a commercial organisation for a sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is a serious problem, which is exactly what this forum is for...idiot.

Brulysses Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what did they think the original tweet would

> do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I am

> calling out a commercial organisation for a

> sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is a

> serious problem, which is exactly what this forum

> is for...idiot.


Did you speak to them directly before making your decision to boycott? Because I reckon the responsible thing to do would be to give them the chance to speak in their own defence before condemning them for something it seems (note I say 'seems') for which they are not to blame.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brulysses Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So what did they think the original tweet would

> > do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I

> am

> > calling out a commercial organisation for a

> > sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is

> a

> > serious problem, which is exactly what this

> forum

> > is for...idiot.

>

> Did you speak to them directly before making your

> decision to boycott? Because I reckon the

> responsible thing to do would be to give them the

> chance to speak in their own defence before

> condemning them for something it seems (note I say

> 'seems') for which they are not to blame.


^this

If they think that's a joke I'll gladly join a boycott, but as they're disclaiming responsibility and seemingly taking action it might have been more seemly to ask for an explanation and then post about them if it was unsatisfactory.


ETA Sorry posted before saw JoeLeg's post - what he said.

Brulysses Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what did they think the original tweet would

> do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I am

> calling out a commercial organisation for a

> sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is a

> serious problem, which is exactly what this forum

> is for...idiot.


Quote


"This horrible tweet did not come from the Perryvale

or it's staff and we are looking into this. We are

deeply sorry"

As you said it's a respectable company however it made a mistake, it's apologised for it and positive action has been taken. This forum is meant to be a fun and useful place for East Dulwich, it's not exactly for "calling out a commercial organisation for a sh*tty, tasteless tweet", however it may be used for that, I can't see any problem. OK they're premises in Forest Hill and Camberwell but hey, this is the Lounge.


Great, you've called out "a respectable company (which also runs the Crooked Well)", you're going to boycott them but why make all the staff 'suffer' because of lost business? Do we really need comments like "realy[sic] hope you go out of business". Do you think the barman at the Crooked Well should get his shifts cut because of lack of business because of a boycott because of a tweet from someone at the Perryvale that was live for a few hours? I don't.


If they showed support the cat killer and suggest they do more cat killing then yes, take action but in reality it was a joke tweet that went wrong. Noone died and no cats died.

b-b-b-but they called me an idiot sir!


I agree with turtle that it's a "tasteless, nasty tweet by this person", it's just the daft storm in a tea cup but let's make it a big issue and bring this small company to its knees for a misdemeanor attitude that annoys me.


It makes some people and small companies scared to be creative or try things out because they fear a massive reprimand from this type of thing instead of simply saying whoops, I won't do that again.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As you said it's a respectable company however it

> made a mistake, it's apologised for it and

> positive action has been taken. This forum is

> meant to be a fun and useful place for East

> Dulwich, it's not exactly for "calling out a

> commercial organisation for a sh*tty, tasteless

> tweet", however it may be used for that, I can't

> see any problem. OK they're premises in Forest

> Hill and Camberwell but hey, this is the Lounge.

>

Too true. Well posted. Move on everyone. Nothing to see here. This element (Tweeting) of modern life can be truly rubbish. Let's get back to jolly banter (pub talk as we oldies call it)

They were hacked and have reported it to the police. I have known Jen and Hector since they opened the Crooked Well and anyone who's ever had any contact with them would know that they would categorically never post something like this. I really hope all those jumping on the hate bandwagon will get back in their boxes as I'd hate for this to negatively affect the businesses that they have worked so hard to build up.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I highly doubt they've been "hacked". I suspect

> they've simply delegated social media to the wrong

> staff member. I'm sure it's been dealt with.


doubt it's the Russians.


People do common social engineering things - like use the public WiFi password or something similar or the name of your dog.


Story attached


http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/devastated-bar-owner-claims-she-was-hacked-over-sick-croydon-cat-killer-tweet/story-30295535-detail/story.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...