Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Brought to my attention by SNARL, this was tweeted by the twitter account of the Perryvale bar in response to a tweet about the cat serial killer: 'it's just a cat...#pussybashing They taste great with a pinot grigio !!' I can't believe that a respectable company (which also runs the Crooked Well) would tweet something like this, it's in extremely poor taste and I for one will boycott both the Perryvale and the Crooked Well.


(Title changed by Admin)

So what did they think the original tweet would do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I am calling out a commercial organisation for a sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is a serious problem, which is exactly what this forum is for...idiot.

Brulysses Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what did they think the original tweet would

> do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I am

> calling out a commercial organisation for a

> sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is a

> serious problem, which is exactly what this forum

> is for...idiot.


Did you speak to them directly before making your decision to boycott? Because I reckon the responsible thing to do would be to give them the chance to speak in their own defence before condemning them for something it seems (note I say 'seems') for which they are not to blame.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brulysses Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So what did they think the original tweet would

> > do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I

> am

> > calling out a commercial organisation for a

> > sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is

> a

> > serious problem, which is exactly what this

> forum

> > is for...idiot.

>

> Did you speak to them directly before making your

> decision to boycott? Because I reckon the

> responsible thing to do would be to give them the

> chance to speak in their own defence before

> condemning them for something it seems (note I say

> 'seems') for which they are not to blame.


^this

If they think that's a joke I'll gladly join a boycott, but as they're disclaiming responsibility and seemingly taking action it might have been more seemly to ask for an explanation and then post about them if it was unsatisfactory.


ETA Sorry posted before saw JoeLeg's post - what he said.

Brulysses Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what did they think the original tweet would

> do, Mark? I am not 'stirring up disrespect', I am

> calling out a commercial organisation for a

> sh*tty, tasteless tweet about something which is a

> serious problem, which is exactly what this forum

> is for...idiot.


Quote


"This horrible tweet did not come from the Perryvale

or it's staff and we are looking into this. We are

deeply sorry"

As you said it's a respectable company however it made a mistake, it's apologised for it and positive action has been taken. This forum is meant to be a fun and useful place for East Dulwich, it's not exactly for "calling out a commercial organisation for a sh*tty, tasteless tweet", however it may be used for that, I can't see any problem. OK they're premises in Forest Hill and Camberwell but hey, this is the Lounge.


Great, you've called out "a respectable company (which also runs the Crooked Well)", you're going to boycott them but why make all the staff 'suffer' because of lost business? Do we really need comments like "realy[sic] hope you go out of business". Do you think the barman at the Crooked Well should get his shifts cut because of lack of business because of a boycott because of a tweet from someone at the Perryvale that was live for a few hours? I don't.


If they showed support the cat killer and suggest they do more cat killing then yes, take action but in reality it was a joke tweet that went wrong. Noone died and no cats died.

b-b-b-but they called me an idiot sir!


I agree with turtle that it's a "tasteless, nasty tweet by this person", it's just the daft storm in a tea cup but let's make it a big issue and bring this small company to its knees for a misdemeanor attitude that annoys me.


It makes some people and small companies scared to be creative or try things out because they fear a massive reprimand from this type of thing instead of simply saying whoops, I won't do that again.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As you said it's a respectable company however it

> made a mistake, it's apologised for it and

> positive action has been taken. This forum is

> meant to be a fun and useful place for East

> Dulwich, it's not exactly for "calling out a

> commercial organisation for a sh*tty, tasteless

> tweet", however it may be used for that, I can't

> see any problem. OK they're premises in Forest

> Hill and Camberwell but hey, this is the Lounge.

>

Too true. Well posted. Move on everyone. Nothing to see here. This element (Tweeting) of modern life can be truly rubbish. Let's get back to jolly banter (pub talk as we oldies call it)

They were hacked and have reported it to the police. I have known Jen and Hector since they opened the Crooked Well and anyone who's ever had any contact with them would know that they would categorically never post something like this. I really hope all those jumping on the hate bandwagon will get back in their boxes as I'd hate for this to negatively affect the businesses that they have worked so hard to build up.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I highly doubt they've been "hacked". I suspect

> they've simply delegated social media to the wrong

> staff member. I'm sure it's been dealt with.


doubt it's the Russians.


People do common social engineering things - like use the public WiFi password or something similar or the name of your dog.


Story attached


http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/devastated-bar-owner-claims-she-was-hacked-over-sick-croydon-cat-killer-tweet/story-30295535-detail/story.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gold men’s wedding band and signet ring suspected to have come off outside of William Rose, Moxons or Bora on Lordship Lane on Friday 9th January during the day. Please get in touch if found. Reward if returned!
    • Hello,  I am interested to know people's opinion regarding dogs left tied up outside shops.  As I am hoping most dog owners are aware of how high risk it is now for dog theft.  People's houses are targeted for dog theft, even waiting to have a dog out in their back gardens, even for few minutes, to steal.  This is a very common occurrence now, as is breaking into properties to steal dogs.  The reasons behind dog theft varies, from using to breed, sell on, to use to sit whilst asking for money, (obviously not all people asking for money are dog thieves & may well own their own dog) and for dog bait for fighting.  This is not me being a drama queen, it is there for anyone to research regarding dog theft.  So would you leave your dog tied up outside a shop? 
    • I don't know if any of the cricket or tennis clubs also have little gyms. There are also pilates studios on Melbourne Grove, Blackwater St, North Cross Rd and even the community hall of the church on Calton Ave. The David Lloyd gym in Orpington is very luxurious and expensive.  
    • HI CPR Dave, I have to agree with Dogkennelhillbilly. We still have net migration into the country as per the Office of National Statistics- https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration It may go negative in a year or two if pundits specialising in this are correct, but it isn't yet. Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, I don't think your maths is correct. Southwark Council states total empty homes at 8,588 -https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/housing/southwark-has-over-8500-empty-homes/ the total number of homes is 135k. Which means 6.36% are empty. However, while canvassing came across an empty home which does not appear to have been appreciated by Southwark Council who are now investigating whether the empty Home Council Tax Premium should have been applied for the last 10+ years. It seems likely the 8,588 is under reporting the number of empty homes.  Infill sites are defined by most public bodies was non strategic sites from a development perspective. The railway yard and other sites are in the Southwark strategic plans and thus would not be infill sites.  Tall buildings planted into lower surrounding suburban areas is a subjective matter whether they are viewed as out of character for the area. It is factually true that I think they are out of character. Equally you have no qualms about such tall buildings being planted into the SE22 area. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...