Jump to content

National treasures...who shouldn't be


????

Recommended Posts

Stephen Fry


Yes he's witty, to a point, he's also 'erudite' etc,,,I suspect he's probably not a bad bloke.


But I just read his autobiography - he has no real depth, seriously, he admits it himself to be fair. He doesn't really think aboiut things just has a photographic memory and is a walking Theasauras, all clever words and no thought. He only got a 2.1 FFS. His acting is limited, although he plays that role well and his writing is b+ at best


I'm going to side with Julie Burchill, he's a thick person's idea of a clever person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony Benn - would have put most of us in gulags and our economy in the stone Age, described Mao Se Tung "as the greatest person of the 20th Century" and was probably the individual most responsible for the rise of thatcherism....yet, he's a cuddly old tea drinking democrat nowadays.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dickensman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Prince of Wales.........Buffoon.


And his brothers too. In fact, you can pretty much add all the royals to the list.


Rowan Atkinson can go in along with Tony Robinson.


Also Kate Moss, Liz Hurley, Naomi Campbell, etc.


Spice Girls.


Cheryl Tweedy.


Simon Cowell.


Gordon Ramsay.


Hugh Grant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Comic genius - and that's before Mr Bean.


Mr Bean cancels out Blackadder.


Johnny English cancels out Not the Nine O'Clock News.


I fear the net result is firmly in the red.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT

>

> See this man, he's ace. And you lot, well you're

> all miserable bastards.


And why have you decided to be all happy for a change.....its not like you at all rosie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surely the simple issue here is (1) Is this just a box ticking exercise - 'we said we'd consult, we have consulted'? or (2) is there any genuine attempt to gain insight so that they could present a 'better' proposal for next year? I'm a cynic, but I'm guessing that (1) is an odds-on favourite here. In which case the choice of venue, and indeed the proposed process, is all about ensuring there will be little embarrassment (and nothing to record on surreptitious smartphones) which could be held against them.  The fact that, apparently, they've invited stakeholders to meet quite far away from the site of the action - which is clearly a disincentive to participate, comes as no surprise. Yes, it's only a few bus stops away but...
    • Another shout for Colin who fitted two catflaps for me. Friendly, efficient, clears up afterwards, and insured too. Nice job Colin!
    • Just bumping this as we are still on the lookout for a goalkeeper for next season. We have a couple of spots available for outfield players too.
    • What a liberty. It makes it so hard to park a a 4x4 across the curb on that corner. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...