Jump to content

Recommended Posts

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Ps in the 60's Camberwell Grove was mentioned in

> the same sentence as Kings Avenue.


"It would, of course be unfair to consider Camberwell Grove to be in the same league as Kings Avenue..."


"A quote without a reference is like a fart in a lift. It's presence cannot be ignored, but it's originator can never be held responsible." - LostThePlot

Exactly. I want my cake etc. Can those of us in The Grove join adopt your ED brand, erect walls along the south side of Camberwell Church Street and Denmark Hill (okay give 'em the shops and Butterfly monster), and leave Camberwell to the growing lot of people hell bent on destroying what is left. They can join forces with central Peckham.

So you mean the 'vulnerable adults' who spend their days scallying about drinking strong cider and swapping prescription drugs?


Totally agree. They should be rounded up and forcibly helped.


Care in the community is a myth. Giving people the freedom to drink and drug abuse themselves to death is not care.


We could do with some of that East Dulwich NIMBYism that won't even tolerate a late night pharmacy- let alone roaming hordes of filthy layabouts.

Sorry - hop aboard the 36 or 436 and music blarring from 14 mobile phones is a bit much. No I don't mind a bit of urban noise, take Lordship Lane, but strink drinking idiots shouting horrendous hate-filled things is something else. And the rudeness of people. Shoving, pushing and all 'round nasty. The Grove deserves a Lordship. Not a third-world, gum encrusted, litter filled, take-your-life-in-your-own-hands through road. Luckily we have the Camberwell Forum back on the case again. Boy have they been a huge force for the better!
Without trying to sound coarse, it's up to local politicians to deal with such things. If you vote some shades of the political spectrum you then get the resulting social experiments. Compassion is good but there is a balance between state responsibility and that of the individual.

In the whole of Dulwich (Village, East and West) six of the nine coucillors are blue.


http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/267/slide1zu7.th.jpg


Lambeth (left) Southwark (right)


The blue numbers are 21 Village, 5 College, 19 Thurlow Park and 7 Gipsy Hill wards. The yellow 6 is East Dulwich ward.

Ah then that explains why things are improving I suppose. I had such high hopes for new labour. Now I think we need an era of tough love ala the blue brigade. Meanwhile back in Camberwell we're blaming ourselves for the behaviour of idiots instead of blaming them.

Whilst I think care in the community doesn't work I don't think that the 'vulnerable adults' are to blame.


Similarly for people addicted to prescription drugs whilst I feel they need stern guidance I don't think they need to be blamed.


As for loud mp3 players and noisy streets then I don't feel there is any blame to attribute.

Surely the 'issue' with music on mobile phones is the dreadful scratchy sound quality.

In my day, if you wanted to treat/inflict your music on the general public in shared public spaces, you at least had the decency to make sure they could hear it properly.


If it didn't need at least 4 Ever Ready PP9's to power-up, it ought not to be seen out of the house.

There's a fine line between blame and holding people responsible. I'll concede it's the latter and we struggle with it in Camberwell. We bear the brunt of all the worst things confronting the Borough and sit and watch everywhere else get truckloads of cash. We did get that new toilet though.


Back on point. The Grove is distinct from the mayhem of Camberwell proper. I think we belong in Dulwich East. Alan you can stay in Camberwell and dish out tough love. I should recommend a bullet proof vest.


Bob. I still have an 8 track. And a Bose state of the art too.

The only places where you get this 'mayhem' are around the Green and outside Nandos and even then it's just unpleasant on the eye. You aren't in danger in either place.


You can't claim that Camberwell Grove is notably different to Love Walk, Grove Lane or even sleepy little Selborne Village (estate agent name for my bit) in terms of 'mayhem'.


Camberwell is generally a nice place but there are a couple of shit bits. It's a familiar tale.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another great job from Leon - sorted a consumer unit and EICR for me last minute. Highly recommend 
    • Admin, please move this if it's in the wrong section. Can anybody recommend a reasonably local dietician (or possibly nutritionist? Not sure what the difference is). My GP has suggested I see a dietician, but there isn't one attached to the practice. I have googled, but it's very hard to tell what people may be like from an online description, and I want somebody who is properly qualified. Alternatively, please PM me if you know of people I should avoid! Thanks x
    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section P48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...