Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Scribe and Katie:

In reply to both your responses I saw the title of the thread "Any hunters in Dulwich"

My response to scribe was meant as a knee jerk to take the pont of view of the Animal being hunted.

I really do not like Cruelty to Animals in any shape or form and I am fully aware that hunting is necesssary

in some shape or form to cull old or sick animals or also a means to thin overpopulated habitats.

If hunting is done so that the animal is not made to suffer I have no problem with that.

If you do not like my point of view I am really sorry but I dont think I am the only one who feels this way.

I am holding a Olive branch out to Scribe.....just make sure you are a good shot.

P.s. It's spelt boar, not "bore", you pillock

Thanks for the spell check....could you name the other Animals you hunt too?

well I thought you was Mature enouth to discuss without being insulting like you was in the comedey thread

I take back what I said above about holding out Olive Branch.

I rather be a pillock then a murderer of Animals...

Ps you can share your meat you kill with katie at a dinner party and brag about how you hunted it.>:D<

Captain Scarlet Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Scribe and Katie:

> In reply to both your responses I saw the title of

> the thread "Any hunters in Dulwich"

> My response to scribe was meant as a knee jerk to

> take the pont of view of the Animal being hunted.

> I really do not like Cruelty to Animals in any

> shape or form and I am fully aware that hunting is

> necesssary


Same here, I hate unnecessary cruelty and am firmly against it.

I grew up where hunting was commonplace. I became a very strict veggie as a teenager (not anymore) and I still cannot bring myself to eat game or venison (sick of it).


> in some shape or form to cull old or sick animals

> or also a means to thin overpopulated habitats.

> If hunting is done so that the animal is not made

> to suffer I have no problem with that.

> If you do not like my point of view I am really

> sorry but I dont think I am the only one who feels

> this way.

> I am holding a Olive branch out to Scribe.....just

> make sure you are a good shot.


You are entitled to your point of view, wasn't meant to imply otherwise.


Edited to add: *I'm outta here*

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Captain Scarlet Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Scribe and Katie:

> > In reply to both your responses I saw the title

> of

> > the thread "Any hunters in Dulwich"

> > My response to scribe was meant as a knee jerk

> to

> > take the pont of view of the Animal being

> hunted.

> > I really do not like Cruelty to Animals in any

> > shape or form and I am fully aware that hunting

> is

> > necesssary

>

> Same here, I hate unnecessary cruelty and am

> firmly against it.

> I grew up where hunting was commonplace. I became

> a very strict veggie as a teenager (not anymore)

> and I still cannot bring myself to eat game or

> venison (sick of it).

>

> > in some shape or form to cull old or sick

> animals

> > or also a means to thin overpopulated

> habitats.

> > If hunting is done so that the animal is not

> made

> > to suffer I have no problem with that.

> > If you do not like my point of view I am really

> > sorry but I dont think I am the only one who

> feels

> > this way.

> > I am holding a Olive branch out to

> Scribe.....just

> > make sure you are a good shot.

>

> You are entitled to your point of view, wasn't

> meant to imply otherwise.

>

> Edited to add: *I'm outta here*


Thank you.

Scribe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> No, I'm not sick. Are you stupid? As gathering-up

> all those free-range chickens I keep hearling

> about and seeing advertised in shop windows along

> Lordship Lane is technically hunting. So, how on

> earth do you all live with yourselves?



It isn't me that is stupid.

If you posted regularly on here, or bothered to read my other posts, you would know that I am against any kind of animal cruelty & would not dream of buying any kind of chicken, unless it was alive and I was keeping it as a pet.


Personally, I think you are having a very boring Saturday evening, so thought you would post a thread on here, to

wind everybody up, and get a reaction.

What could be better than the subject of hunting?, which so many people feel strongly about.


This thread should keep you busy all night.

Captain Scarlet/Swampy, I'm going to ignore your last comment and try to address this contention in a civilized manner.


As I've consistently maintained throughout this thread: I oppose trophy hunting i.e - running foxes ragged with hounds. It's a cowardly, pointless pursuit. But I would be a fool to think that the hunting of animals is welcomed by all. It's not.


When I hunt large game with a bow I do it humanely and conscientiously. I use a specialised kill head that's designed to cause enormous hemorrhaging, so as to bleed-out the animal as quickly as possible. It's also the law. I also pay the animal due respect by putting myself in its habitat. I don't hide in a wooden box all day waiting for a dozy deer to walk across my line of fire. I also harvest all the meat that I can and keep the hide with a view to sell it. We hunters are also avid conservationists, in that we strive to maintain the environment we hunt in. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say we probably share exactly the same environmental principles. In short, I'm not a monster/mysteron.


Below is what a kill head looks like, if you are unfamiliar with its appearance:


http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSn1aXr4EzvxRbSg_Uzxlv-2uYYDk-8td8EHfITNqWGFDJyQLTM&t=1

The only hunters in E,D,are the councils pest control,they dont go after rabbits, and I dont think they would use

your enormous kill head on them.

There would be no little pelts left to sell and no meat either.

Surely hunters would know where all the other hunters hang out anyway.



What are you blathering on about? I'm not trying to wind anyone up. I started this thread with good intentions. We've only gone down this road because my thread has been hi-jacked and I'm being labelled as some kind of monster. I'm not. And I'd appreciate it if we could steer this thread back on course, thank you very much!

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People, this guy is taking the peas! Don't

> entertain him or he just might blow your house

> down.



Couldn't agree more.

Like I said, he's having a dull weekend & has nothing better to do.



Nice spin, on something you seem incapable of debating. I don't have the time to trawl through your x amount of posts on this forum. But I admit that I suggested you were stupid because you implied that I was sick because I hunt animals. I'm happy respect your decision not to eat animals, but I ask you to respect my position on legitimate hunting.

Scribe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Nice spin, on something you seem incapable of

> debating. I don't have the time to trawl through

> your x amount of posts on this forum. But I admit

> that I suggested you were stupid because you

> implied that I was sick because I hunt animals.

> I'm happy respect your decision not to eat

> animals, but I ask you to respect my position on

> legitimate hunting.



Sorry, but I could never respect anyone that kills animals for fun.



OK, I won't deny that I enjoy the tracking aspect, but unless you've done it yourself, you can't appreciate the spiritual connection of hunting an animal and enjoying it as food. I could be as petty as you and say that you revel in the uprooting of an inncocent, vulnerable vegetable, but I won't. I won't apologise for hunting animals. It's perfectly natural. It's the way of the world. Are you so disparaging towards motorists, whose vehicles emmisions contribute towards the suffering of animals all over the world? Oh, and do you wear plastic shoes


I'm sorry, but you're pathetic in your selective, misguided scorn.

Scribe,


I 'hunt' or should i say used to hunt as there's not much call for it in ED!

I grew up on a farm in Perthshire Scotland. Had a my own shotgun at 12yrs old and so on

Huntin' shottin' fishin'n all. It is the way of the land as they say.


I enjoyed that upbringing very much and still believe in hunting as a means to control game etc. I also enjoy the 'sport' and enjoy the end product too.


What i don't get about you. Is this bow'n'arrow fettish, if i may call it that.

As you rightly say, it's illegal in the uk. If you enjoy 'hunting' so much, why don't you just use a gun rather than the bow? Would mean you could enjoy your sort more frequently?? Surely the hunt is that... it is the chase so the end result is the same. Why prolong the death by using a bow?

Scribe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> OK, I won't deny that I enjoy the tracking aspect,

> but unless you've done it yourself, you can't

> appreciate the spiritual connection of hunting an

> animal and enjoying it as food. I could be as

> petty as you and say that you revel in the

> uprooting of an inncocent, vulnerable vegetable,

> but I won't. I won't apologise for hunting

> animals. It's perfectly natural. It's the way of

> the world. Are you so disparaging towards

> motorists, whose vehicles emmisions contribute

> towards the suffering of animals all over the

> world? Oh, and do you wear plastic shoes

>

> I'm sorry, but you're pathetic in your selective,

> misguided scorn.



Actually I do wear plastic shoes & I don't drive, which is beside the point anyway.


Now who is being pathetic?

Next you will be telling me that a vegetable feels fear & pain, the same as a cow on it's way to slaughter,

a fox being pursued by hounds,

or a deer with an arrow piercing it's side.


You can never justify a cruel, sick hobby like yours.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...