Jump to content

Any other hunters in East Dulwich?


Scribe

Recommended Posts

Scribe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> More weak spin from those who enjoy the flesh from

> the animals they proclaim to be sacrosanct. But

> openly condemn those who harvest the meat they

> eat. How hypocritical, how false, but oh so

> revealing.

_____________________________________________________


? Who was that aimed at Scribe

A few posts went by, you need to clar-ify ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearson, my comment was aimed at all my baseless, selective detractors. And I don't have a "bow fetish", either. I just can't be bothered with all the fuss and police intrusions that come with owning a firearm in this country.


Aquarius moon, I don't have a "sick hobby". You're predictable sticking your fingers in your ears and falling back on a popular rebuttal without offering a reasoned reply. Sucks to be you.


Annette Curtain, what I can only assume is your husband must be very proud of himself to have shot a Coyote. He is exactly the sort of pathetic, cowardly parasite that gives conscietious hunters a bad name. Or did he do the animal justice and eat it?


Captain Scarlet, I don't hunt bears. They're are a protected species in the countries where I hunt with a bow. And whenever I hunt, I do so in a way that gives the beast I'm stalking a sporting chance of survival. Many of my quarry have escaped my stomach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was illegal to rabbit/hare course with lurchers?


Shooting animals with a crossbow sounds particularly inhumane, I'm surprised that's legal.


Not my idea of a fun weekend so I won't be joining you but whatever floats your boat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Hunting with both a bow and a crossbow is illegal in the UK. I never said/wrote that I take large game in the UK with either. I quite clearly stated that I go abroad. But yes, hunting with a dog of whatever breed is illegal in the UK - I don't support it, as I've made quite clear throughout this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scribe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pearson, my comment was aimed at all my baseless,

> selective detractors. And I don't have a "bow

> fetish", either. I just can't be bothered with all

> the fuss and police intrusions that come with

> owning a firearm in this country.

______________________________________________________


I have a firearms license and I own a shotgun for the record.


So, what fuss and police intrusion do you speak of.

Fairly straight forward procedure to go through.

Also, how would you know if you don't have a license?


Just asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearson, a shotgun license is a fairly straight-forward proceedure. A full-bore license, however, is not. To be deemed responsible enough to own a full-bore weapon you must submit yourself to a gradual and arduous progression through calibers increasing in size. This proceedure also requires mentoring. The police also scrutinise any weapons you keep your property, and how they are secured. They do this every six months, so I'm told. I prefer a bow or a crossbow because it's more in tune with nature and it is less demanding in a legal sense.


I know all of this because I've asked. There's no conspiracy on my part, however which way you go about implying it.


Oh, and to counter the argument that bow hunting is inhumane. Studies have found that using a kill head competently will not result in the beast suffering more harm than if it was taken with a gun. Besides, there are many variables to contend with on both weapons to reach an absolute comparison. And to quell any suspicion that I attached an image of a kill head to cause friction, this is what is legally not permisable when taking large game, across the EU and North America. It is what's used in target and field archery. It's called a pile or bullet head:


http://www.quicksarchery.co.uk/superbasket/images/products/636/s_qp15.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Aquarius moon, I don't have a "sick hobby". You're predictable sticking your fingers in your ears and falling back on a popular rebuttal without offering a reasoned reply."



I've already replied. You only see it as unreasonable, because you don't agree.


I see any form of hunting as cruelty, whether it is fox hunting, shooting, or using a crossbow.

Hare coarsing, badger baiting, dog fighting etc. etc.

I am against all of it.


Animals have a right to live on this planet, the same as us, without having to suffer the fear & pain inflicted on them

by humans, just to give the perpetrator a cheap thrill.


Are you telling me that the deer you hunt, do not feel anything, when you stalk, then shoot them with your 'high tec'

bow & arrow?

It is illegal here because it is cruel.


Animals are living creatures, not just pieces of meat, put on this planet to be abused for your enjoyment.


And I am not a hypocrite. I practise what I preach, so I hope your earlier post was not referring to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aquarius moon, I don't feel any sorrow or remorse when I stalk and cleanly kill a deer. I see it as prey. And even if I were to, unintentionally, cause my quarry suffering with a bad shot, I'd probably just feel frustrated. But I would swiftly cut its throat or drive a blade under the base of its skull, so as to not prolong any undue agony.


It would seem that we're just going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you illiterate cretin. I'm defending my position, and by doing so, explaining mine and others' methods to offer a wider understanding to those who aren't familiar. But tell me something, Tarot. Are you and Pearson one and the same? I ask because you both display a suspiciously similar incompetence when it comes to typing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scribe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Aquarius moon, I don't feel any sorrow or remorse

> when I stalk and cleanly kill a deer. I see it as

> prey. And even if I were to, unintentionally,

> cause my quarry suffering with a bad shot, I'd

> probably just feel frustrated. But I would swiftly

> cut its throat or drive a blade under the base of

> its skull, so as to not prolong any undue agony.

>



Boy am I glad that U.K gun laws exist.


I can see "Guns & Ammo" all neat & orderly on a bedside cabinet.


Nette:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[www.albertabushadventures.com]

> olf-hunting3.jpg "Ah ????'s y'got me again.."



Annette Curtain, what I can only assume is your husband must be very proud of himself to have shot a Coyote. He is exactly the sort of pathetic, cowardly parasite that gives conscietious hunters a bad name. Or did he do the animal justice and eat it?




Scribe, you "illiterate cretin", are you an Annette actually two sides of a split personality?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scribe I really don't understand why you're being so aggressive on this thread. I'm sure you knew a thread like this would be quite contentious?


I know you're being judged and whether this is fair or not it is a public forum that you've posted on and people will have theit opinions. I'm also not saying you're the only one being aggresive but given that you started the thread maybe a touch of diplomacy wouldn't go amiss?


Apart from anything else I don't really understand the thread. It's not a discussion more that you wanted fellow hunters to contact you so maybe it should really go in the wanted thread. If it had the admin might have asked people who wanted to debate the subject to start a thread in the lounge. Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zeban, I'm not being aggressive, I'm being tenacious. I simply initiated a thread that cordially invited other hunters to discuss and swap details. It was then hi-jacked, and I defended my position with equal measure. I admit that I've perhaps over-stepped the mark once or twice, but I felt it necessary to stave-off what I perceived as aggressive, group harrassment, engaged in inflammatory supposition. You'll also notice that I haven't on any occasion used bad language or issued threats against my detractors. Overall, I've remained quite calm.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sounds like you are running scared of the idea Earl, come now with so much debate over what is a consultation /referendum surly it's a simplel way of settling the argument 🤔 
    • Pot holes feel like they’re becoming more of an issue (based purely on my perception, don’t know what data there is). Even worse outside London imo. I suspect as Mal says, heavier vehicles are part of the problem (both SUVs, but also EVs which are generally heavier than ‘conventional’ cars), but regardless the council need to be more on it.  You can use the fixmystreet app to report them (and other street maintenance issues). 
    • Prior to the LTNs do you have many examples where the results of consultations were not acted upon? Seems to me the council is picking and choosing when they action the feedback from their constituents.......   Have you looked at the results from that, if not, tale some time to have a look, its quite enlightening..it seems the majority do not think the changes will have the desired effect....but you know it's not a refendum so the council has chosen to ignore the feedback of constituents. They must be assuming full responsibility for ignoring residents feedback- clearly they think they know what's best for us. If it all goes wrong let's see if they take responsibility!   Earl, here's a question for you (and i know you wont answer it but lets see)...why do you think the council has never asked a yes/no question to local residents about anything to do with the LTNs - wether they exist or whether we think the changes they have suggested (using our money) are needed/worthwhile? Or a consultation with a yes/no answer but we all know why. I still laugh that the council had to re-run the CPZ consultation with a yes/no answer and finally had to listen to their constituents...they took a hell of a spanking! They have been cheating the system for years and getting away with it. So does that not apply during consultations then? (P.S before you answer take a look at the definition of a consultation as provided by the Local Government Association).
    • What other matters of policy would you have decided by referendum, or is it just the one you feel strongly about? 🙄 We live in a representative democracy for good reason. After Brexit I thought this would be even clearer. We’ve had local elections since the LTN came in and those who introduced it were returned to office. You may want to revisit a debate that finished 3 years ago, but it isn’t going to happen. You need to move on. …still no one willing to defend the claims in One Dulwich’s latest missive I note. 😂
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...