Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My son wants to travel to school on his own and the P13 bus (going towards Streatham) would do the trick. However he has tried it 3 times now and only once did it get him to school on time.


Once the bus didn't turn up and when the next one did (20 mins later) it was too full to get on. The third time we tried, the bus arrived on time but was too full to get on. (We are trying to catch it on Underill Road). The bus is too infrequent (every 20 mins or so between 7 and 8 in the morning) to wait for the next one.


Does anyone use the bus at that time of the morning with any success?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16250-reliability-of-p13-bus/
Share on other sites

I used to get it to school when it still went to Surrey Quays. It gets badly delayed at the point of going through Peckham, and I think there is a bus diversion off Rye Lane at the moment so that may be why. The P13 and the P12 generally take longer too because they venture down residential/back roads where they can get stuck if there's any meeting and clearance.


In the end I gave up with buses and got the train to school. Even if they do get delayed it's usually not for more than ten minutes or so, and they're not much more expensive than the bus. Plus you know when it's coming thanks to the information boards.

I used to get it to Aske's in new cross and my sister still gets it every morning. It is often late, and yes at the moment it is on diversion through peckham which delays it. I was often late to school, but only because I never got it together to catch the earlier bus, which would've got me there in good time even if it was 15 minutes late - make sure you allow for that!

Have you thought about cycling? (depending on destination, obviously)


It may be possible to devise routes that are off-road, along quiet roads, on designated cycle paths on pavements, etc.


It would probably get him there a lot faster.


I think there's a group locally involved in devising safe journeys to school by walking and cycling.


(The P4 bus also suffers from the same problems.)

Is he travelling to Kingsdale or Duwich College, etc?


My daughter bus-hops with her friends - 185 or 176 to the Harvester and then the P4 or 363 or some other combination.


When she got the P13, it was fine getting on around 7.40 by East Dulwich station, but was very very full by Underhill. He's probably better doing the bus-hopping route!

Unfortunately we are too far away from Lordship Lane for the 185 or 176 to work.

We tried the 363 then P4 once to go along Dulwich Common but the P4 was also very late and we only just squeezed on!


I think biking will be the way to go but how do you carry a saxophone on a bike?

Southwark offers free cycle training and will practice a cycle route with some one to get to school or work.


Carrying a saxophone. either rucksack as suggested OR get a pannier rack and pannier. London Recumbents based in Dulwich Park would give some good advice or Herne Hill Cycles.

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Very poor the P13 you are better off hiring a

> snail



Loving this comment.


Southwark cycle training for adults worked brilliantly for me - and I'm relatively confident, cycling twice a day every weekday in London for 5 years now. Did the training about 2 years ago and got so much out of it. Can't recommend it enough.


For bike shops, I heartily recommend and have no ties at all with the well-named Bicycle Magic, Greatorex Street, Whitechapel.


Hop over to Honor Oak Park and get the Overground up there.

dully Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The P13 and all the P buses are rubbish. Too

> crowded in rush hours and too unreliable to use

> for appointments.




Aye. Too unreliable for life really. I got the Pwhateveritis from Brenchley Gardens to Surrey Quays once. It was the longest trip of my life. New Year's Eve. I set off in 2010 and nearly arrived in 2011.

Until Rye Lane re-opens, the P13 is diverted along Lyndhurst Way and Peckham High Street, not serving Peckham Rye station nor Hanover Park.


Despite the bus running along the whole of Queens Road towards New Cross, it's still very unreliable during the peaks especially and should be at least 4 buses an hour during those periods, alas it was reduced to 3 when the contract moved from London Central to Abellio London.

Just tried the sax in its hard case in my pannier. It does fit - just. But it does make the bike a good 10 inches wider and very side heavy. Would need to carry schoolbag in other pannier to even up the weight and even then it still might be a little unstable.


The sax case does have D-rings to attach rucksack straps to, so might do try that also.


I did see someone cycling through Herne Hill with a cello on their back but it did look hard work.

why limit yourself? the service over the entire course of the day is poor. People who live in areas dependent on it just take up a bike or car. The last bus of the day just does not show up. The whole bus route is so bad that there must be some clause of sorting out a public service that doesn't do much of a service.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of Smoke Control law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all per se, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...