Jump to content

Recommended Posts

These filmings are good news.


Southwark Council gets revenue from issuing a permit to the filming company for using the public domain for commercial purposes.


HMRC gets a tax payment from the resident after the tax return showing the fee from the filming company is submitted.

worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And you'll spend ?10k restoring your property

> after a film crew's been through it. Make sure you

> get a lot of insurance before you let them in.


Its the Location Manager who ensures there's no damage and their insurance should cover it (as per the agreement you sign) but of course, accidents happen. It must be very rare for a property needing 10k of repairs. Have you some experience of extensive damage from a location shoot?

It's the production company's responsibility to make good any damage caused by filming. This can often be very expensive but nothing to do with your own insurance.


worldwiser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And you'll spend ?10k restoring your property

> after a film crew's been through it. Make sure you

> get a lot of insurance before you let them in.

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's the production company's responsibility to

> make good any damage caused by filming. This can

> often be very expensive but nothing to do with

> your own insurance.


Is it prudent for the "host" to take out temporary additional public liability insurance as this commercial activity is unlikely to be covered by the "host's" regular insurance and as protection if a claim arises and the production company's insurance is defective?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Never understood why there are not more speed cameras on Lordship Lane and the surrounding area - not sure what happened here exactly, but given the damage to the front of the vehicle as a result of the impact of the traffic light, it seems very unlikely that this person was driving slowly.
    • I am always really surprised by the glowing reviews of Franklins. Not sure whether it was once very good, and so it is just somewhere that is now remembered as that and thought of fondly by those who have known it since its opening all those years ago? As someone who has lived in the area for a few years now, and having tried it a few times (mostly as a result of the positive reviews), I have always been pretty disappointed. The food has always been average for the price point, and last time we visited we waited about 40 minutes to place an order. Hopefully whoever buys it can make improvements - it would be great to have a reliable pub on the lane that serves good food (similar to the Kerfield or Camberwell Arms, etc.)!
    • I will buy you a frothy coffee from anywhere you like on Lordship Lane if that happens. Most of these costs never get recovered from the drivers that caused them. The photo shows a car that's been left on the zigzags protecting the crossing. Pedestrians crossing East to West and drivers heading South won't see each other until the pedestrians are in the road. That is a dangerous position to leave a car in. (I don't know if it's stil there, obviously).
    • Seems a pretty dangerous position to me - apart from getting in the way of pedestrians trying to cross the road large vehicles heading south have to edge into the oncoming traffic lane to get past. I've got a normal-sized car and had to squeeze through a gap the other day.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...