Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There's three main cornerstones to commercial success: profile, perception and revenue. The best returns are when all three of these are contributing as a single unit.


A wedding like this one, that fills televisions across the world, massively increases the profile of 'Brand Britain' whilst dominating coverage with positive messages.


The advertising value of this coverage is trillions. You just couldn't buy it.


When 2/3 of the job is done for you, it makes converting revenue so much the easier.


Put it another way, when was the last time that your telly had a month sepcial how great Lithuania was?

I'm not sure you read what I was saying - I no longer live in ED, I live in Singapore and work with clients in media internationally.


The coverage of the royal wedding is possibly heavier outside the UK than it is in the UK.


Whatever cynicism you may have about the Royal Family as a Briton, it's not reflected in the sense of glamour, sophistication and culture that they project overseas.


I think Fergie is a rather witless Hooray Henry. The US think she's a princess; I think Prince Andrew is a drunken prat but the Saudis like to buy warplanes from Princes.


The wedding raises the profile and positive perceptions of the UK. It makes overseas customers more inclined to work with UK companies, buy UK products, invest in UK industry and visit the UK.


The revenue is generated by the increased UK-related transactions made by overseas individuals and companies.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But what are these positive messages? What will be

> producing the revenue? If this thread is anything

> to go by, most people want to avoid the dreaded

> wedding.



Not me! looking forward to it.... flags at the ready!!

"Is there any evidence for this?"


There's an old quote popular in advertising circles that goes "50% of my advertising expenditure doesn't work, the problem is that I don't know which 50%"


Unless you have a very specific direct response advertising campaign (e.g. 'call now for a 50% discount') it's virtually impossible to discuss the impact of a particular advert


People's buying decisions are tied up with the very complex relationship they have with a brand. The brand itself is a series of emotional associations that are built up by an entire lifetime of encounters with a product. This includes the product itself, it's advertising and packaging, it's reputation and so on.


For British companies exporting overseas that relationship is built not only upon their own activities, but also on their customers' perceptions of what a 'British' company is.


Most of us do it all the time - for example the idea that German is ruthlessly efficient, or the Japanese products are technically advanced, or that Chinese products are cheap tat.


The Royal Wedding is a massive contribution to Brand Britain. It's dominating overseas scheduling with extremely positive messages about Britain.


There is certainly a large proportion of people who falsely believe that 'advertising doesn't affect me'. If they want to insist, in this light, that the wedding does not contribute to overseas perception of Britain and consequently commercial success of British companies then there's not much I can say to persuade them.


They are however, simply wrong.

  • 2 weeks later...

yup - Social media is full of bah-humbug contrived, gesturing, it's below me, quasi-republicans...


YES< YES YES we get it you're are cool, it's below you etc, now STF up and let most people enjoy a bit of fun and pageantry on a day off


The decent republicans have either kept quite or gone abroad the banging drum spoiling it for everyone else posturers are hovering about all over the internet.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can’t say I approve but equally staff can vote with their feet. Cabs to collect and deliver - not bad.Maybe Gail’s know something none of us do… Having said that, sure those that are walking in and around Dulwich might prefer cake, hot drinks etc in a venue that is not a pub with the noise from over loud punters… so guess one waits and sees…  Do take some pics or let us know if people are popping in… my guess is yes… 
    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...