Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Its partly the ending of the councils Community Wardens service in the Lordship Lane area - they report a lot of eco crime. I still report lots of stuff but a lot of area to cover!


If it bugs you please do become a Street Leader - voluntary role to give you an inside track on getting eco crime fixed.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16728-graffiti/#findComment-427069
Share on other sites

I'm not getting into this again but there's as much evidence refuting the 'broken window effect' as there is in support of it. It's not scientific, it's a politically motivated selection of evidence to support a specific thesis. Not arguing that grafitti is good, or that it doesn't beget grafitti but it isn't proven that it represents some sort of inevitable collapse of general order.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16728-graffiti/#findComment-427185
Share on other sites

A well painted piece can really lift an area. The mural outside Brockley station is a good example, and seems to keep taggers away. Or at least stops them tagging over it out of respect?


Tagging looks sh1t, always has done, always will. And as for scribing on bus/train windows, my god thats the lowest of the low. Would love for the perpetrators of that sort of kak to be made to PAY for replacing the windows which I'm sure arent cheap.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16728-graffiti/#findComment-427230
Share on other sites

I've noticed a lot of tagging too - on Sargent's butchers, by the Court Lane entrance to Dulwich park and on a couple of street boards - seems to be the same signature. I have mentioned it to the police who have said that the local safer teams are on to it. Looks like someone in particular wants to be noticed.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16728-graffiti/#findComment-427266
Share on other sites

As i said - i don't really want to get into this dicussion again because we went ove rall this before when discussing what to 'do' about the brick wall on North Cross Road - see forum thread from way back, on which I wrote


'...but since you asked, a quick google search reveals 'More Guns, Less Crime' Univ of Chicago Press, 2000. Which refutes the Broken Windows theory.'


We also discussed the difference between pure science and social science, of which both your 'broken windows' document and any that draws a different conclusion, is the latter. Incodentally the following is the response I received from a Criminologist friend when I mentioned the Broken Windows article.


"It?s possibly the most influential criminology article ever published, and it wasn?t even by a criminologist ? hilarious. It?s what?s called the ?common sense? criminology of the right. Policy friendly. James Q Wilson, adviser to Reagan and Bush senior (and perhaps also Dubbya). Source of zero tolerance policing? Very few studies have concluded empirically that minor ?incivilities?, if left unchecked, lead to more serious ?crimes?."


So please don't pass it off as fact. It's a theory.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16728-graffiti/#findComment-427400
Share on other sites

From my understanding of this, it was the Mayor Guilani of New York who took a zero tolerance, rapid response approach to criminal damage, on the basis that (as correctly posseted above), crimes like tagging will encourage more tagging, and the possibility of 'broken window/broken building/broken community' cascades.


He implemented the process with the massive cooperation of NYPD, and in a sense 'proved' that when rapid response and zero tolerance are implemented, the problem does not escalate, but will in reasonable time be reduced to a small group of hard core graffiti artists, who operate within a fairly strict code of conduct. ( respecting the graffiti of others, only 'tagging' on non-commercial/non-owned/non-private property).


Unfortunately the resurgence of 'old skool' hip-hop among teenage youth brings with it the resurgence of hip-hop gang-culture art. Schools are suffering with it, as the youngsters do not fully understand the 'code' that accompanies the action.


The police in Soutwark will deal with offenders who are caught, with Community Service and repeated 'Triage' interviews to encourage remorse, but, as we all know, kids will be kids.


Criminal damage it is - at least no-one gets hurt.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16728-graffiti/#findComment-427435
Share on other sites

That's entirely my point, that is an experiment that suggests a link, but there are others that suggest no link - and certainly not a simple one. You're talking about human social behaviour, there must be millions of factors contributing to that in any environment.


None of these can be shown to 'prove' anything, they just suggest. People, naturally, tend towards the evidence that supports their view or - in the case of this particular theory - justifies their policy. And anyway Social Science used to advance a particular political standpoint? There must be plenty of examples of that as well and not all of them very pretty. Can't be trusted.


Just to be clear though, I'm not disputing that a tag on a wall will probably encourage other taggers, it's a territorial thing after all (isn't it? I really don't know), but the link to a decline into more serious disorder or crime is too tenuous for me, or too convenient.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16728-graffiti/#findComment-427510
Share on other sites

Hi evelknievel,

The Dutch research appears exceptionally thorough. It was a piece of scientific research so can never prove something but the broken window theory is the most valid we currently have and the peer reviewed research supports this theory.


What alternate theory are you proposeing and what peer reveiwed research supports it?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16728-graffiti/#findComment-427523
Share on other sites

2 be honest m8 at the end of the day thiers' no diference between grafiti art nor tagging. 2 start with its' against the law. i seen some of this grafiti and i do'nt think picaso done it. LOL. :)) sooner these so call 'artists r court the better, what we need is bigger fines or ASBOs 4 these chav scum
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16728-graffiti/#findComment-427720
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...