Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm sorry to report that I was chugged on Lordship Lane yesterday at approximately 4pm. Three of them came at me - I tried to avoid them but one of them caught up with me just outside Somerfield.


Description: Two white males, one black female (and no, I'm not racist, before anyone starts). All wearing light coloured tabards with red piping around the hems - and carrying clipboards.


Just wanted to let everyone know so they can be on their guard. My neighbour has been chugged four times this year and says he can't remember it ever being this bad.

Chuggers have been in operation near the co-op for months now on and off - I usually bark "No!" the moment they open their mouths - short and sweet and I don't even have to break stride. To rub it in I may stop and buy a Big Issue and exchange a few pleasantries with the vendor before moving on.
I'm all for giving to charity but this is just harassment! Someone once told me to ask a chugger, "how much are you getting paid?" highlighting the fact that donations are paying for them to be there. I don't believe this form of campaigning is effective anymore, if people want to give to charity they can through nice campaigning such as TV advertisements/websites etc, not harassment!
CHUGGING - derived originally from SUGGING - Selling Under the Guise of Research - i.e. those peope who used to pretend to be Market Researchers and would then try to sell a financial vehicle - invented as a term by the MR industry who were upset that these people were bringing valid street MR into disrepute. 'Chuggers' don't always try to raise Charity under the Guise of Research, but, like Suggers - approached you in the street with a clip-board like legitimate Market Researchers did. but then tried to drum up donations.

I have Never heard the Term 'Chugging' before... But understand what you are all on about.


'Chuggers' ?? Just ignore them. Simple.


I give money to Genuine Collectors like Red Cross, RNLI Life Boats, RNIB.


I myself have been a Collector for The RNLI. Some Years back.

Licenced Spot.


Rules:- Do not approach people. Do not Rattle the Box.


Never give money at the door.


NONE of the genuine Charities Collect at the Door.

It all starts so innocently, dabbling in brightly coloured tabards, but it can escalate so quickly, first a couple more polka dots, to look a bit zany and pretty soon they've progressed to red noses, twirly bow ties and oversized shoes.

It's always such a tragic but oh so predictable downward spiral.

If you want to REALLY upset a chugger then ask for a detailed break-down of how much of your donation is going to the charity and how much is going into their own coffers. I've tried twice and both times it ended in tears (not mine). I've never known a less straight answer to a straight question. And I really object to the way they try and flirt with you. And the way they say something like "never mind, have a nice day anyway" as you walk off, because you know that they really just want to flip you the finger.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wouldn't be seen talking to anyone in a tabard,

> a well cut kagoul though is a different matter.



I suppose this means the medieval banqueting evenings I was planning are a waste of time. But a hill-walkers' ho-down sounds like an idea...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? I don’t want people to feel like they need special clothes just to walk or cycle. If you have lights and reflectors and you’re on well lit city streets, there is no reason why drivers shouldn’t be able to see you, assuming of course, that they're driving with due care and attention. But yes, if there are lots of people without lights, that should be addressed. I suspect in part, it's the change over in seasons and the fact that people are getting caught out by how early it's getting dark now (obviously no excuse).
    • Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com   please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE
    • What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. 
    • On the plus side showers are warm down - for now 😆
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...