Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If it weren't for needing to send emails, I

> wouldn't have a blackberry. But email's great and

> it's irredeemably shit on an iphone. Blackberries

> make you look like a boring square. But that's

> what I am.


Huh & Haaaaaa...


>A blackberry makes you look like you

> actually do some work"


Well depends who you're trying to impress/deceive as your thumbs go at lighting speed ....


*clik clik....clikity clik*


"I'm a workin' down here boss"


Reminds me of that scene from Cool Hand Luke where Paul Newman escapes after tying a thread to a bush


"I'ma workin' down here boss"


If ever a device transmits weird kind of neurosis via its operator, it's a BlackBerry.



I leave you with this quote posted HERE


Quote:

Originally Posted by HeroBerry

You could replace a kid and besides you can't get a software update for your kid.



Nuff said.


Nette:)

http://www.thekidswindow.co.uk/images/CMScontent/Image/469369~Tin-Can-and-String-Telephone-Posters.jpg


* dances around phone *

I switched from an old ndroid to the iphone 4 after days of reading reviews of all the new androids, and after playing for an evening with a friends htc desire s.


It's the best move for sure- the iphone really is a lovely bit of kit. The apps are great, it's soooooo easy to use (for text and email- dunno why people think it's tricky for email, my gmail on there couldn't be more user friendly).


I can't think of a single thing that has peed me off with the iphone yet- i've not even noticed it has no flash player.

I've nothing against iPhone. I mean I did think it a bit rum that there was no warning that iOS4 would render the iPhone 3 unusable, but my son destroying tit via the medium of drool rendered that whole gripe academic anyway.


In terms of apps I guess there are a few exclusively iTunes apps, but none that I miss (well, I have them on my ipad) and other than that there's no difference between an iOS app and an android one except that the latter is easier to write and you can even do so on a PC, meaning the contributor base is absolutely massive by comparison, oh and developers aren't hamstrung by restrictive T&Cs looking after Apple's interests.


Oh and Swype, if iPhone 5 doesn't ship with swype then more the fool apple. I always hated the iOS autocorrect, but now on my ipad I sooo resent having to type a letter at a time, it's like soooo 20th century.


Just swype man!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...