Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DaveR Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "You chose to spend your money on your family,

> I

> > spend mine on the match. Everyone has a

> choice."

> >

> > That seems like a sensible perspective. Keef,

> > stop wasting your money on that kid and start a

> > standing order to the Rafa Transfer Fund.

>

>

Rafa transfer fund? Blimey you're trying to pay people to take him off your hands, that's a bit drastic!!!!

that was cheating end of. Doesn't matter about contact/no contact in this instance. He was still in full control of the ball and realised he was getting too close to another Brum defender. Carsley was stupid lunging in as he didn't need to, but how anyone can look to justify that with "intent" is ridiculous.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a foul.

> That is why intent is important.

>

> But I did not see it, so no idea on the specific

> incident.



But there wasn't intent to commit a foul. Intent to commit a foul was McManus against Hearts a couple of weeks back. This challenge was an intent to get the ball, nothing else.

There was absolutely no need for him to go down, he was still in control of the ball. In fact, he didn't just go down, he went up and then down!!!!

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a foul.

> That is why intent is important.

>

> But I did not see it, so no idea on the specific

> incident.


MM, if you click my Agog link you'll get a Youtube video of the whole sorry affair.

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> that was cheating end of. Doesn't matter about

> contact/no contact in this instance. He was still

> in full control of the ball and realised he was

> getting too close to another Brum defender.

> Carsley was stupid lunging in as he didn't need

> to, but how anyone can look to justify that with

> "intent" is ridiculous.


Or Carsley assumed N'Gog was going to pull the ball back and dived in to block. N'Gog read his intention and dived over him.

In fairness all of the clubs we support have players who have been guilty of a similar offence in recent years, for example Van Nislerooy, Rooney, Pires, Eduardo, Gerrard, Cole et al. So I think to be fair we shouldn't blow it out of all propotion. As undeyfying as it is, we all know it goes on. If i'm honest the worst I've seen which effected my own club, has to be Rooneys dive to gain a penalty at old trafford when we were on for a 50 game unbeaten run. But hey ho, that's life. Ngog was still out of order. Unfortunately I don't think it will be the last we see of such behaviour.

Just tried to click on the link and it has been deleted due to a copyright by Liverpool football club!


Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a

> foul.

> > That is why intent is important.

> >

> > But I did not see it, so no idea on the

> specific

> > incident.

>

> MM, if you click my Agog link you'll get a Youtube

> video of the whole sorry affair.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bloody hell, "Germany and Hannover 96 goalkeeper

> Robert Enke has died after being hit by a train in

> an apparent suicide on Tuesday, police have

> confirmed" -

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/internati

> onals/8353733.stm


Saw this report last night. Very sad.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> did you not see what happened to all the companies

> that tried to show Scottish football in England?

> They folded because noone wanted to watch.


SP. Setanta folded because of over paying for its EPL rights (if you meant setanta).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
    • https://www.letslinkuk.net/ I'm interested to know why the OP didn't find this sort of scheme to work, as I would have thought it was much harder to find someone to do a direct exchange with? Does anybody else have experience of a scheme like this? Happy to be persuaded! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...