Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Atila Reincarnate

Atila Reincarnate

Posted
Posted

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DaveR Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "You chose to spend your money on your family,

> I

> > spend mine on the match. Everyone has a

> choice."

> >

> > That seems like a sensible perspective. Keef,

> > stop wasting your money on that kid and start a

> > standing order to the Rafa Transfer Fund.

>

>

Rafa transfer fund? Blimey you're trying to pay people to take him off your hands, that's a bit drastic!!!!

SCSB79

SCSB79

Posted
Posted
that was cheating end of. Doesn't matter about contact/no contact in this instance. He was still in full control of the ball and realised he was getting too close to another Brum defender. Carsley was stupid lunging in as he didn't need to, but how anyone can look to justify that with "intent" is ridiculous.
SCSB79

SCSB79

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a foul.

> That is why intent is important.

>

> But I did not see it, so no idea on the specific

> incident.



But there wasn't intent to commit a foul. Intent to commit a foul was McManus against Hearts a couple of weeks back. This challenge was an intent to get the ball, nothing else.

There was absolutely no need for him to go down, he was still in control of the ball. In fact, he didn't just go down, he went up and then down!!!!

Sandperson

Sandperson

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a foul.

> That is why intent is important.

>

> But I did not see it, so no idea on the specific

> incident.


MM, if you click my Agog link you'll get a Youtube video of the whole sorry affair.

kpc

kpc

Posted
Posted

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> that was cheating end of. Doesn't matter about

> contact/no contact in this instance. He was still

> in full control of the ball and realised he was

> getting too close to another Brum defender.

> Carsley was stupid lunging in as he didn't need

> to, but how anyone can look to justify that with

> "intent" is ridiculous.


Or Carsley assumed N'Gog was going to pull the ball back and dived in to block. N'Gog read his intention and dived over him.

Atila Reincarnate

Atila Reincarnate

Posted
Posted
In fairness all of the clubs we support have players who have been guilty of a similar offence in recent years, for example Van Nislerooy, Rooney, Pires, Eduardo, Gerrard, Cole et al. So I think to be fair we shouldn't blow it out of all propotion. As undeyfying as it is, we all know it goes on. If i'm honest the worst I've seen which effected my own club, has to be Rooneys dive to gain a penalty at old trafford when we were on for a 50 game unbeaten run. But hey ho, that's life. Ngog was still out of order. Unfortunately I don't think it will be the last we see of such behaviour.
Ladygooner

Ladygooner

Posted
Posted

Just tried to click on the link and it has been deleted due to a copyright by Liverpool football club!


Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a

> foul.

> > That is why intent is important.

> >

> > But I did not see it, so no idea on the

> specific

> > incident.

>

> MM, if you click my Agog link you'll get a Youtube

> video of the whole sorry affair.

kpc

kpc

Posted
Posted

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bloody hell, "Germany and Hannover 96 goalkeeper

> Robert Enke has died after being hit by a train in

> an apparent suicide on Tuesday, police have

> confirmed" -

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/internati

> onals/8353733.stm


Saw this report last night. Very sad.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> did you not see what happened to all the companies

> that tried to show Scottish football in England?

> They folded because noone wanted to watch.


SP. Setanta folded because of over paying for its EPL rights (if you meant setanta).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • malumbu
      Should facial recognition be mandatory for retail outlets?

      By malumbu · Posted

      Community payback already exists   https://www.gov.uk/community-sentences/community-payback
    • beansprout
      Flu and Covid jabs locally

      By beansprout · Posted

      Thanks for that - none  of mine  have been Mordena - whilst vulnerable cat, think I will just take my chances… Will be having flu though - certainly not by choice - much prefer not to but in vulnerable group.. Avoided them until last year…. Luck of drawer if you are as sick as fog  or just sore arm … assume - god knows - that flu jab is same throughout country.       
    • beansprout
      Should facial recognition be mandatory for retail outlets?

      By beansprout · Posted

      Wow, that is what it costs for one prisoner. So they get full board and lodging, 24 hour  monitoring  in over populated prison, we are led to believe, minimum exercise, assume a tv in each cell provided - in USA it is together with wash hand basin and c toilet - some have showers as well.   Clearly this amount of money takes  into account overstretched and overworked prison officers, protection for them, counselling which is, in my opinion a bare minimum dealing with prisoners in all settings. Do if Sweden can look outside the box, why can’t we? Or are we just not bothered at all / read statistics some where that reoffending is normal and to be frank, with economy as it is at the moment re employment, cost of living and homelessness..not surprised they reoffend to get back inside - food provided, roof over your head - much better than street living, mixing with wrong crowd, trying to get roof over your head, find a job where 90 % won’t employ you as been inside..
    • vladi
      Should facial recognition be mandatory for retail outlets?

      By vladi · Posted

      @beansprout The Swedes seem to have a useful strategy with regard to offenders  which has reduced repeat offending.  I agree that prison time for minor offences is a complete waste of time. Even worse is that prisons are "colleges of crime" where inmates learn about how to be do crimes and worst of all, become exposed to drug taking. I wouldn't advocate having chain gangs as in the USA but some strategy for getting them into say manual work under supervision might be useful - especially if it came with a modest wag. This would be significantly cheaper than the £51,100 it costs per year for  keeping one in jail.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...