Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DaveR Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "You chose to spend your money on your family,

> I

> > spend mine on the match. Everyone has a

> choice."

> >

> > That seems like a sensible perspective. Keef,

> > stop wasting your money on that kid and start a

> > standing order to the Rafa Transfer Fund.

>

>

Rafa transfer fund? Blimey you're trying to pay people to take him off your hands, that's a bit drastic!!!!

that was cheating end of. Doesn't matter about contact/no contact in this instance. He was still in full control of the ball and realised he was getting too close to another Brum defender. Carsley was stupid lunging in as he didn't need to, but how anyone can look to justify that with "intent" is ridiculous.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a foul.

> That is why intent is important.

>

> But I did not see it, so no idea on the specific

> incident.



But there wasn't intent to commit a foul. Intent to commit a foul was McManus against Hearts a couple of weeks back. This challenge was an intent to get the ball, nothing else.

There was absolutely no need for him to go down, he was still in control of the ball. In fact, he didn't just go down, he went up and then down!!!!

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a foul.

> That is why intent is important.

>

> But I did not see it, so no idea on the specific

> incident.


MM, if you click my Agog link you'll get a Youtube video of the whole sorry affair.

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> that was cheating end of. Doesn't matter about

> contact/no contact in this instance. He was still

> in full control of the ball and realised he was

> getting too close to another Brum defender.

> Carsley was stupid lunging in as he didn't need

> to, but how anyone can look to justify that with

> "intent" is ridiculous.


Or Carsley assumed N'Gog was going to pull the ball back and dived in to block. N'Gog read his intention and dived over him.

In fairness all of the clubs we support have players who have been guilty of a similar offence in recent years, for example Van Nislerooy, Rooney, Pires, Eduardo, Gerrard, Cole et al. So I think to be fair we shouldn't blow it out of all propotion. As undeyfying as it is, we all know it goes on. If i'm honest the worst I've seen which effected my own club, has to be Rooneys dive to gain a penalty at old trafford when we were on for a 50 game unbeaten run. But hey ho, that's life. Ngog was still out of order. Unfortunately I don't think it will be the last we see of such behaviour.

Just tried to click on the link and it has been deleted due to a copyright by Liverpool football club!


Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If there is intent to commit a foul, it's a

> foul.

> > That is why intent is important.

> >

> > But I did not see it, so no idea on the

> specific

> > incident.

>

> MM, if you click my Agog link you'll get a Youtube

> video of the whole sorry affair.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bloody hell, "Germany and Hannover 96 goalkeeper

> Robert Enke has died after being hit by a train in

> an apparent suicide on Tuesday, police have

> confirmed" -

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/internati

> onals/8353733.stm


Saw this report last night. Very sad.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> did you not see what happened to all the companies

> that tried to show Scottish football in England?

> They folded because noone wanted to watch.


SP. Setanta folded because of over paying for its EPL rights (if you meant setanta).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm wondering if I can justify a visit due to calories burned walking there and back😜
    • Oooh! Hot chocolate! Thank goodness it isn't nearer! I'd have doubled my weight in a month 😄
    • Before going to Social Media it is always worth checking out the details: Southwark's spending for this year: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/council-tax/how-we-manage-council-tax/our-budget-and-how-we-spend-council-tax/our-income-and As you will see, as with most if not all London Boroughs, shed loads goes on social care and children's services.  The cost of paying for residential care, and for 'specialist schools is massive.  As with other boroughs they have been hit hard by austerity under the coalition government.  And the failure by successive governments to sort out social care.  That is a thread all in its own rights. Local authorities of all political persuasions across England are facing tough times, several have gone into administration: Birmingham, Woking, Thurrock, Croydon, Slough, Northamptonshire, and Nottingham and 11 are on bailouts.   Covid will not have helped.  Some will have made some poor investment decisions in the past eg Thurrock and Woking;  Some total mismanagement and one has been hit by historical debt through not paying their workers fairly (Brum).   Reform promise simple solutions to cutting spending.  Not that easy is it Nige?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...