Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just don't get Coyle's decision? I mean he may be getting offered more money and a bigger transfer kitty, but it can't be by that much. His reputation whilst at Burnley was very good and he looked like he could be going places. He's taken quite a big risk with this move.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My eldest son has a mate who is Jamie O'hara's

> cousin...

>

> Meanwhile my milkman's cat's uncle's

> brother-in-law reckons Man Utd are going to buy

> Messi in the transfer window.



What a card you are, did you stay up all night writing this, or was it written for you? Hilarious, give up your day job and become a script writer, you clearly have a huge talent for it.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Get off Bentley's back. I've seen many players who

> have revitalized their careers under different

> managers. Let's face it, he doesn't get many

> opportunities under Harry and when he does he

> can't afford to have any slip ups or else he'll

> get dropped. I though Harry was a master of man

> management and the arm round the shoulder. Seems

> it doesn't extend to Bentley. You ve soon forgot

> about the great goal he scored against Old Vinegar

> face's bunch of foreigners last season. Call

> yourself a Spurs fan.


Sorry, really can't let this one go. Bentley has been living off that goal against Arsenal ever since and it was way back in October of 2008. What's he done since then? Fack all!


Who would you take out of the current Spurs midfield to accomodate him? That's Lennon, Huddlestone, Palacious and Kranjcar who are all playing really well at the moment and deserve their place in the team that's also bearing in mind you've still got Modric and Jenas waiting in the wings trying to get in there too. And we've not conceded a goal in five games either.

I didn't say I'd take anyone out of the team to accomodate him. I simply pointed out that he's a good player. His main problem is he lacks motivation. You've just pointed out what a task he'd have to displace some of those players. He knows he'll never get the chance with Harry so I guess his attitude may be why bother. It's a shame as it's not like Huddlestone and Jenas have always pulled up trees over last two seasons yet they always know they'll get opportunities evern if they play badly. Enough Bentley bashing.

jimmy two times Wrote:


"He knows he'll never get the chance with Harry so I guess his attitude may be why bother."


*

*

*

*


Come on isn't that a very poor attitude to have. He should be busting a gut to get into the team. Unfortunately, he isn't. You know as well as I do no one has a divine right to play. You have to earn your place.


Anyway, I think we've got a really good chance of winning at Anfield this weekend. Come on you Spurs!

I agree that players should bust a gut and I also agree about Jamie O'Hara. I was sad to see Harry let him go on loan as he certainly always did a job for us in a number of positions. I just think that sometimes a player can get branded as arrogant or hard to handle and they find it difficult to rebuild their reputation no matter how hard they try. He really does not get many opportunities under Harry to put anything right. Anyway, enough about Bentley..I agree about the game at Anfield., weather permitting.

COME ON YOU LILYWHITES !!!

The news coming out of Angola regarding the attack on the Togolese team bus is shocking and saddening. The driver has been killed a couple of the players injured. How, and who made the decision to Angola. Will the African cup of nations be cancelled. Well ask yourself this, what happened after Israeli athletes were murdered at the 1972 Munich games, what happened after Heysel, & Hillsbrough, were the relevant events cancelled? For the love of Pete.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...