Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

????

????

Posted
Posted

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't there a Bolton player on the ground for

> several minutes about 10 minutes after that

> incident, with Bolton in possession and they never

> once kicked it out of play? Seems a bit

> hypocritical of them to shout "unfair"


that maybe. But the fact that they should hsve had a freekick and Gallas off with a red rather thsn a goal against is mainly what they are moaning about. Can you imagine what Wegner would be saying?

Atila Reincarnate

Atila Reincarnate

Posted
Posted
The ref on the night was awful. Every decision seemed to go to Bolton. Over the course of a season refs make some shocking decisions last night was no exception.A team is under no obligation to kick the ball out when a man is down especially if the player down is one of the team in possession. We've been on the receiving end of some shocking tackles, Adebayors kick on Van Persies head for example. Bolton chose to play on and we won the ball and scored. Stop crying Coyle, 2 nil and you fcuked it up.
Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Nice of the Arsenal fans to cheer when Mark Davies was carried off after Gallas's horrendous tackle. That's really sporting of them don't you think? Cunts!


Spurs had a perfectly good goal disallowed and two possible penalty appeals turned down last night which for me changed the course of the game. I thought Howard Webb had a bit of a shocker and showed himself to be a homer. That's the way it goes sometimes.

Atila Reincarnate

Atila Reincarnate

Posted
Posted

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bad week for refs. What do you expect from Gooners

> Jah? I can imagine who was leading the chorus. :))


I thought you were determined to ignore me? I know you can,t bless you. Try not to let the green eyed monster take over your deluded thinking. Rags fans have cheered when opposition players have injured as have scum fans so it's a case of pot calling the kettle black. As if I give a shit about what Rags or a scum fan thinks. The holier than thou mantle is not one either of you can adopt with any credability. Rags losing against citeh, scum losing us winning, it doesn't get any better. Bring it on.

ruffers

ruffers

Posted
Posted

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So the FA will do

> nothing about the Gallas tackle. It shows they are

> consistent if nothing else. They did sod all about

> the leg breaker on Eduardo, so they've shown some

> sort of consistency.


It's a different situation, completely. The ref saw the Eduardo tackle and sent the guy off, action was taken therefore the FA can't act retrospectively. Gallas foul the referee didn't see it, and the rule is if that's the case then the FA can act. This is the bit I don't get.


So there's no consistency - in one case the rules were followed, the other not.

jimmy two times

jimmy two times

Posted
Posted
What irks me about the Gallas foul was the thought of how he reacted to the Eduardo injury. Wasn't that the game when he sat on the pitch afterwards and wouldn't come off? A fine example for a captain to set. You would think that he would try not to do to another player what he saw done to his teammate if it upset him so much.
ruffers

ruffers

Posted
Posted

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They can taunt each other as much as they like, G.

> Neville has achieved more in the English league

> than Tevez ever will. Ruffers, are you a Gooner?



Not sure how you came to that conclusion, City fan here. CTID.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Pugwash
      MET Engage

      By Pugwash · Posted

      At the Dulwich Hill SNT meeting last night we spoke about Met. Engage. Dulwich Hill had signed up 185 households. Scheme  had been trialled in other parts of the country successfully and now the Met. Police are rolling it out, To the end of August, the Met Police had gathered 17,000 registrations which equites to 2% of households.
    • GooseGreenGoods
      Cat owners, be alert.

      By GooseGreenGoods · Posted

      Personally, I think the death sentance should be brought back for anyone found to be harming animals. 
    • ianr
      MET Engage

      By ianr · Posted

      When you dig into the site, there's an ancillary domain also involved in the system: neighbourhoodalert.co.uk;  and one pointed to by the latter as an example, stayintheknow.co.uk, which seems to have been set up by Lancashire.  All three long validated by Nominet and with same registrar.    metengage_etc_whois.txt
    • Jasper_98
      Jan - Silver Fern Landscapes

      By Jasper_98 · Posted

      Another positive review and recommendation for Jan from Silver Fern Landscapes. Jan helped us repair a broken fence, which was tucked away in a difficult location. Jan was friendly, prompt and informative throughout the process. He accommodated our requests and left the repair site spotless.  His mobile is 07905950686.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...