Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

SimonM

SimonM

Posted
Posted

>>SimonM...I see killgallon has gone. A big loss? Nice to see another ex-Leeds academy product in the premiership though.<<


I think so. But he is in his prime at 26 & it has been clear for ages he wanted to leave, so ?2 million 21 games before he could have gone for nothing is not bad going. He turned down both Newcastle and Burnley before agreeing to Sunderland. I take it you realise Leeds get 20% of the fee? :))

kpc

kpc

Posted
Posted

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had to smile reading news that Gary Cook,

> speaking of Man City's future world domination was

> recorded in a pub in New York called The Mad

> Hatter. Maybe he meant Luton......just as likely!


Has to be said, every time I see Gary Co*k I like him less and less. A disgrace to the club he allegedly supports.

Bluerevolution

Bluerevolution

Posted
Posted

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Declan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I had to smile reading news that Gary Cook,

> > speaking of Man City's future world domination

> was

> > recorded in a pub in New York called The Mad

> > Hatter. Maybe he meant Luton......just as

> likely!

>

> Has to be said, every time I see Gary Co*k I like

> him less and less. A disgrace to the club he

> allegedly supports.



The Mad Hatter NY is the hq of MCFC Official Supporters Club NYC- there is a large fanbase there.

KPC, must admit I gringe when he releases a statement !

david_carnell

david_carnell

Posted
Posted

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >>SimonM...I see killgallon has gone. A big loss?

> Nice to see another ex-Leeds academy product in

> the premiership though.

> I think so. But he is in his prime at 26 & it has

> been clear for ages he wanted to leave, so ?2

> million 21 games before he could have gone for

> nothing is not bad going. He turned down both

> Newcastle and Burnley before agreeing to

> Sunderland. I take it you realise Leeds get 20% of

> the fee? :))



We get 400k....good stuff. Might come in handy for next season. Hope he does well at Sunderland.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh well thank you missus mockers.

> "oh come on Mockney, the game is over, hang out

> the clothes will ya"

>

> grumble grumble grrrr


Its only a game Mockney. Hope Rory is not too upset (about his choice of team;-)).

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I support Man U, Matthew. I also love rugby. One

> doesn't exclude the other. However there tends to

> be more idiots involved in football than rugby

> IMO.


I think just as many idiots follow Rugby it's just footy is more intense and perhaps brings rowdy behaviour quicker to the fore.

Bluerevolution

Bluerevolution

Posted
Posted

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Declan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I support Man U, Matthew. I also love rugby.

> One

> > doesn't exclude the other. However there tends

> to

> > be more idiots involved in football than rugby

> > IMO.

>

> I think just as many idiots follow Rugby it's just

> footy is more intense and perhaps brings rowdy

> behaviour quicker to the fore.



It's more to do with Rugby fans being more middle class than football fans. My wife used to live in Twickenham and got really fed up with Rugby fans weeing through her letter box

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Declan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I support Man U, Matthew. I also love rugby.

> One

> > doesn't exclude the other. However there tends

> to

> > be more idiots involved in football than rugby

> > IMO.

>

> I think just as many idiots follow Rugby it's just

> footy is more intense and perhaps brings rowdy

> behaviour quicker to the fore.


No Matthew - a much higher proportion of idiots follow football. Rugby is a bit more civilised, surely. I'm not aware that there has ever been violence between rugby fans - compared to the history of violence between football fans - surely that says it all.

kpc

kpc

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not aware that there has ever been

> violence between rugby fans - compared to the

> history of violence between football fans - surely

> that says it all.


I was part of a group of Moseley fans attacked by Leicester fans at the Cup Final at Twickenham as far back as 1979!! And from talking to colleagues who go to games regularly, it does seem to be creeping into fan behaviour as the game tries to attract a wider audience.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Pugwash
      UK Government Consultation on SEND

      By Pugwash · Posted

      Special Educational Needs
    • march46
      We Are Blighty Scam on Lordship Lane

      By march46 · Posted

      Definitely not a charity, but a for-profit community interest company (CIC).  https://www.londoncentric.media/p/we-r-blighty-fundraising-regulator-criticism-broke-rules
    • Sue
      We Are Blighty Scam on Lordship Lane

      By Sue · Posted

      Yes I saw that. I'm not intending to give them money! I just wonder why, if they are actually collecting money under false pretences (rather than not having gone through the proper channels) they have not been prosecuted?
    • Monkey_vs_Robot
      We Are Blighty Scam on Lordship Lane

      By Monkey_vs_Robot · Posted

      From the Fundraising regulator link: "we concluded that it was more likely than not that donors could have been misled by confusing messaging or fundraising materials. This includes materials suggesting a link with a well-known national veterans’ charity, which the CIC has since confirmed it does not work with. We were also concerned about the costings in some of the fundraising materials that the CIC could not show good enough evidence for. There was also enough information available for us to conclude on balance that some fundraisers for the CIC acted in an aggressive and unprofessional way towards both potential donors and public officials."   Some of the money may make it to the people they say but there are better ways to support veterans 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...