Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's 3 wins in a row for Liverpool over United.


And each time Vidic has been sent off.


Depends on how Liverpool approach the game to whether this is another win. I expect United to play their usual rushing game in the final third to unsettle the Liverpool back 4 marshalled by Sergeant Carragher. I think if Liverpool try to play a game of containment they will lose by 2 or 3 goals but if they take the initiative I think Liverpool have too much power in midfield if they cut loose for United to stop the Reds chalking up another victory.


Howard Webb is the Ref, and his track record at OT is far from convincing but let us hope he has a fair game.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sandperson Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > And they did! ;-)

>

> Oh yes, yes and YES!!! happy happy happy!!

>

> Back up the top where they belong...

>

> Alex will be sleeping well tonight.


I think that might be due to the whisky he consumes!

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, LG. Just as Wenger likes the company of small

> boys. That's a bit old now isn't it? Don't take on

> Atila's mantle


Sandperson

My post was said tongue in cheek. I don't think comments on paedephilia are warranted - no matter who you are talking about. And I am certainly not taking on the mantel of Atila.


Ladymuck is a friend and neighbour and I am sure she has not taken offence over my post.

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Ladymuck is a friend and neighbour and I am sure

> she has not taken offence over my post.


Oh dear...time to say something...


Just to confirm...Ladygooner, no offence whatsoever was taken...I realised (knowing you and your fabulous sense of humour as I do!) you were joking.


Presumably (the lovely) Sandperson doesn't know you, and I suspect was simply watching my back - which was nice too. (Us Red Devils need to stick together...;-)).


xx

Well, I was offended. I don't care whether LM was or not.


If it's tongue in cheek then fair enough but just as you don't like the comments about Wenger and all the paedophile guff (which, if you read my post properly I was using as an example of being outdated and ridiculous) I don't like the alcholism comments.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...