Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I suspect Roy Keane may be high on the list. 16/1 decent odds on him. Larsson is very inexperienced but many would choose him.

Mark Hughes or David Moyes would prob not be interested but they are high in the betting for some reason. Apparently they have been close to getting Moyes in the past.


Its a big decision for the club and they need to make a better decision than last time. They have seen that a poor manager makes for a poor team and ruins revenues pdq.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Martin O'Neill would be an interesting choice.

>

> I have a huge soft spot for Mick McCarthy. He has

> the foullest mouth on him but does seem to get

> results.


Mick McCarthy is a former Celtic captain - that's why you like him PGC.


Martin O Neill won't go back - he did a fantastic job and second to none over the last 20 years, don't give me that strachan nonsense.

No disrespect to Celtic but I think your best bet Mick Mac is to go for an up and coming Scotsman. Many of those guys in your list would rather spend the season on the TV sofa lecturing us on the art of management than getting their boots dirty north of the border.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No disrespect to Celtic but I think your best bet

> Mick Mac is to go for an up and coming Scotsman.

> Many of those guys in your list would rather spend

> the season on the TV sofa lecturing us on the art

> of management than getting their boots dirty north

> of the border.


You know I never liked you matt.


Did you ever give me that fiver from the last time you were wrong?

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only 3? Chelsea maimed most of our team in the

> week!


Well, we do have a lot of injuries ourselves at the moment too and I'm rather of the opinion that this game is very much a potential banana skin for us. I won't believe that we'll get that 4th spot until the last kick of the season. Though we are playing well and getting some good results at the moment there is still plenty of scope for us to slip up.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha, yes I did give you that fiver Mick - it's

> become an annual tradition now that someone takes

> five pound off me when I am wrong.


It seems Matt that you are right most of the time - except when you throw some money at Wales.....

Of Spurs remaining fixtures I only see them collecting 3 points against Bolton, and 1 at Sunderland.


Sunderland v Tottenham

Tottenham v Arsenal

Tottenham v Chelsea

Man Utd v Tottenham

Tottenham v Bolton

Man City v Tottenham


For Liverpool what I have put in brackets


Liverpool v Sunderland (3)

Birmingham v Liverpool (1)

Liverpool v Fulham (3)

Liverpool v West Ham (3)

Burnley v Liverpool (0)

Liverpool v Chelsea (1)

Hull v Liverpool (0)


Which by my calculations means they will finish on same points as Spurs and it will be decided on goal difference, which based on number of forecast wins and defeats should mean the Reds pip Spurs.


EDITED to say I forgot Spurs last game of season away at Burnley, so that makes Spurs by a margin of 3 points!

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of Spurs remaining fixtures I only see them

> collecting 3 points against Bolton, and 1 at

> Sunderland.

>

> Sunderland v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Arsenal

> Tottenham v Chelsea

> Man Utd v Tottenham

> Tottenham v Bolton

> Man City v Tottenham

>

> For Liverpool what I have put in brackets

>

> Liverpool v Sunderland (3)

> Birmingham v Liverpool (1)

> Liverpool v Fulham (3)

> Liverpool v West Ham (3)

> Burnley v Liverpool (0)

> Liverpool v Chelsea (1)

> Hull v Liverpool (0)

>

> Which by my calculations means they will finish on

> same points as Spurs and it will be decided on

> goal difference, which based on number of forecast

> wins and defeats should mean the Reds pip Spurs.



Thank God for the application of science...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...