Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Doesn't matter who Bale is up against he'll skin 'em anyway. He's in the form of his life at the moment.


I'll quite happily settle for a point at Old Trafford tomorrow but what worries me is that for the first time in my life I want Arsenal to win tomorrow. Can't have those nouveau riche upstarts grabbing 4th spot.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Doesn't matter who Bale is up against he'll skin

> 'em anyway. He's in the form of his life at the

> moment.

>


Although it is of course worth mentioning that Steve Finnan had him in his pocket for 120 minutes 2 weeks ago!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'll quite happily settle for a point at Old

> Trafford tomorrow but what worries me is that for

> the first time in my life I want Arsenal to win

> tomorrow. Can't have those nouveau riche upstarts

> grabbing 4th spot.


Try being United atm. We want Arsenal to win against City AND Liverpool to beat Chelsea. I get indigestion just thinking about it. :))

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > red devil Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > Bale looks the business...Evra's eventual

> > replacement Jah ;-)

> >

> > Feck off. You can't afford him.

>

> Not that I believe a word the Express prints,

> but... Fergie, Fergie, Sign Him Up...



On second thoughts...you can keep him! :))

C'mon Stoke!

Evra was pretty useless defensively when he arrived at United now look at him, probably best left back in country after Ashley Cole. Bale reminds me of Riise, great going forward but a little slow on the turn.. and it appears a bit of a ball watcher judging by Nani's goal.


Looks like Chelsea have got it sown up against Stoke - 3-0 HT.


Next weekend will be interesting particularly if Spurs/Villa/City all drop points otherwise I think United will find it more difficult at Sunderland to pick up a win.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...