Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nice one. You've gotta love Ian Holloway. He always speaks his mind and there is absolutely no bullshit about him.

Wayne Rooney on the other hand is one spoilt little brat. I think if he leaves Man Utd and they are one of the biggest clubs in the world (in stature if not financially) he could live to regret it.

What puzzles me about Rooney is that he claims to be fit yet when he has played his touch has been so poor. I'm not even sure there is a relationship between 'touch' and fitness but he hasn't been the the player he was for some time now including the WC.


As for Rooney's statement, every idiot in the land knows Rooney isn't capable of stringing two sentences together in English. I heard Lou Macari on the radio yesterday and he was certain from speaking with the contacts he has at OT that this is all about money and nothing else.

I'm certainly not trying to defend Rooney, especially the way he (or should that be his ex-Kirkby vacuum selling salesman of an 'agent') has gone about this, but just imaagine him in that England dressing room during the WC sitting next to that usless big fat arsed donkey Gareth Barry, knowing he's getting paid more...

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sandperson Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I thought I read they were prepared to offer

> him

> > ?150k.

>

> I think you're probably right. Let's face it There

> are players at Man City on ?200,000 a week. That's

> a lot of Ferraris.


I was talking about United Jah.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...