Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Stoke 2 v Birmingham 1 (will Pillis get a decision in his favour?)

Tottenham 2 v Sunderland 0

Aston Villa 2 v Blackpool 0

Chelsea 3 v Fulham 0

Newcastle 1 v Blackburn 2

West Ham 1 v West Brom 1

Wigan 1 v Liverpool 2

Wolverhampton 1 v Arsenal 1

Everton 2 v Bolton 2

Man City 2 v Man Utd 3 (not sure about this one, could go either way)

Chelsea had three players out that's all. Lampard, Essien and Drogba (who came on as a sub). Chelsea are a rich club with a big squad and should be able to cope. Spurs have five or six players out most of the season and I think we've done quiet well so far. Just hope we stuff Sunderland this evening.

Chelski are definitely a weaker squad than last year with Ballack and Cole leaving, replaced by Ramires who looks a bit lightweight and Benayoun who is a lightweight.

Utd are still in 2nd gear, and to be only 2-5 points behind Chelski at this stage bodes well for when we traditionally kick on in the new year.

If the reports of loads of Utd players being out with flu/injuries are true, then it wouldn't surprise me if Citeh won, let them have their 5 minutes in the sun, it'll be business as usual when the silverware is handed out...tick tock :)


http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/stretclock.jpg

What Keef said.


Mac that might be so but a rich club like that should be able to cope. Still, one result does not make a season.


Very disappointed with the Spurs result tonight but we've still got plenty of players out. We're especially missing the cutting edge and goals that Jermain Defore gives us.

Fair to say that had benitez delivered a 2-0 win against Chelsea whilst under fire, his supportes would be showing the result as proof positive what a manager he was/is


i don't have anything against Benitez but I think many people have been unduly harsh on Roy. Judge him at the end of the season not this soon (see his similar record at Fulham)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What Keef said.

>

> Mac that might be so but a rich club like that

> should be able to cope.



Of course they can "cope", but it was a weakened midfield and against Liverpool's strongest team at Anfield, it levels the playing field.

I work with a Sunderland lad who wnet to the spurs game last night having purchased his ticket from a scumbag tout outside the ground, all touts are parasites in my view, anyway, it was for a seat amongst the home fans. Either very brave or vey stupid. He says he sat on his hands throughout the game and didn't say a word, he also claims the spurs goal was handball.

Very entertaining game at Palace last night, Palace winning 3-2 and some superb goals, the Ambrose goal arguably better than Torres second v Chelsea and a screamer from Garvan.


A season ticket for under under 16's is only ?70! and if you have moved here from up north/Scotland is it realistic or fair on your kids that they can only support your original team but never/rarely see them? Start watching a local team, it's got to be better than your kids not going to football or deciding to support Chelsea or Arsenal but only going once a year for a birthday treat along with a visit to the megastore.


So give Palace a go its only 20mins away by car or train, or even try Millwall, Palace is a tad more friendly though:)

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I work with a Sunderland lad who wnet to the spurs

> game last night having purchased his ticket from a

> scumbag tout outside the ground, all touts are

> parasites in my view, anyway, it was for a seat

> amongst the home fans. Either very brave or vey

> stupid. He says he sat on his hands throughout the

> game and didn't say a word, he also claims the

> spurs goal was handball.


Well he would say that wouldn't he. I could say we should have had a penalty and that Cattermole should have been sent off but there you go. Swings and roundabouts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...