Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Stoke 2 v Birmingham 1 (will Pillis get a decision in his favour?)

Tottenham 2 v Sunderland 0

Aston Villa 2 v Blackpool 0

Chelsea 3 v Fulham 0

Newcastle 1 v Blackburn 2

West Ham 1 v West Brom 1

Wigan 1 v Liverpool 2

Wolverhampton 1 v Arsenal 1

Everton 2 v Bolton 2

Man City 2 v Man Utd 3 (not sure about this one, could go either way)

Chelsea had three players out that's all. Lampard, Essien and Drogba (who came on as a sub). Chelsea are a rich club with a big squad and should be able to cope. Spurs have five or six players out most of the season and I think we've done quiet well so far. Just hope we stuff Sunderland this evening.

Chelski are definitely a weaker squad than last year with Ballack and Cole leaving, replaced by Ramires who looks a bit lightweight and Benayoun who is a lightweight.

Utd are still in 2nd gear, and to be only 2-5 points behind Chelski at this stage bodes well for when we traditionally kick on in the new year.

If the reports of loads of Utd players being out with flu/injuries are true, then it wouldn't surprise me if Citeh won, let them have their 5 minutes in the sun, it'll be business as usual when the silverware is handed out...tick tock :)


http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/stretclock.jpg

What Keef said.


Mac that might be so but a rich club like that should be able to cope. Still, one result does not make a season.


Very disappointed with the Spurs result tonight but we've still got plenty of players out. We're especially missing the cutting edge and goals that Jermain Defore gives us.

Fair to say that had benitez delivered a 2-0 win against Chelsea whilst under fire, his supportes would be showing the result as proof positive what a manager he was/is


i don't have anything against Benitez but I think many people have been unduly harsh on Roy. Judge him at the end of the season not this soon (see his similar record at Fulham)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What Keef said.

>

> Mac that might be so but a rich club like that

> should be able to cope.



Of course they can "cope", but it was a weakened midfield and against Liverpool's strongest team at Anfield, it levels the playing field.

I work with a Sunderland lad who wnet to the spurs game last night having purchased his ticket from a scumbag tout outside the ground, all touts are parasites in my view, anyway, it was for a seat amongst the home fans. Either very brave or vey stupid. He says he sat on his hands throughout the game and didn't say a word, he also claims the spurs goal was handball.

Very entertaining game at Palace last night, Palace winning 3-2 and some superb goals, the Ambrose goal arguably better than Torres second v Chelsea and a screamer from Garvan.


A season ticket for under under 16's is only ?70! and if you have moved here from up north/Scotland is it realistic or fair on your kids that they can only support your original team but never/rarely see them? Start watching a local team, it's got to be better than your kids not going to football or deciding to support Chelsea or Arsenal but only going once a year for a birthday treat along with a visit to the megastore.


So give Palace a go its only 20mins away by car or train, or even try Millwall, Palace is a tad more friendly though:)

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I work with a Sunderland lad who wnet to the spurs

> game last night having purchased his ticket from a

> scumbag tout outside the ground, all touts are

> parasites in my view, anyway, it was for a seat

> amongst the home fans. Either very brave or vey

> stupid. He says he sat on his hands throughout the

> game and didn't say a word, he also claims the

> spurs goal was handball.


Well he would say that wouldn't he. I could say we should have had a penalty and that Cattermole should have been sent off but there you go. Swings and roundabouts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I was woken around midnight the other night as a Lime man tried to untangle a heap of three bikes someone had piled on my driveway. They block the pavements and people knock them over in frustration. I wrote to Lime and told them that in future any bikes left near my property would be securely stored away for collection at a mutually convenient time for both parties. I confiscated one at the weekend but a man knocked on our door looking to rent it while I was at work and my son gave it to him! I told Lime it's not fair of them to push the problem on to the local collection depots, they create the problem by allowing users to dump the things wherever they like. If they were penalized for doing so that would put an end to it.
    • The SDCAS Crowdfund campaign is now live: Help Save Southwark Day Centre for Asylum Seekers! "I’m proud to be an advice volunteer at Southwark Day Centre for Asylum Seekers (SDCAS), a community that welcomes and supports refugees, migrants, and asylum seekers in Southwark. Right now, we’re facing the toughest moment in our nearly 30-year history. Unless we raise funds this September, we may not be able to keep offering the hot meals, English classes, advice, and safe community space that so many people rely on. That’s why I’m asking you to support our emergency Crowdfunder: 👉https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/save-sdcas  Even a small donation, or sharing this with your friends and family, will make a huge difference in helping us to reach our £70,000 goal and keep SDCAS open. This place means so much to me, and to everyone who walks through our doors 💛.Thank you for your support in spreading the word.  ... Be sure to tag us @SouthwarkAsylum on Facebook and @sdcascommunity on Instagram We really value your support, £70K is an ambitious goal but we know our dedicated supporters can get us over the line! Our sincere thanks in advance from all of us at SDCAS. Best wishes Judith Arkwright"  
    • The address is: Bradbury Oak House, 4 Underhill Road, SE22 0AH
    • "2.2.1 The Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB) has undertaken a comprehensive consultation process with its residents and stakeholders regarding the proposed development which aims to create 41 additional units and has been designed to address the growing demand for accessible and supportive accommodation for individuals with visual impairments. 2.2.2 The consultation process has been a key part of the planning phase, ensuring that the needs and preferences of current residents are taken into account. RNIB has held several meetings, workshops, and surveys to gather feedback on the design, facilities, and overall impact of the new development. Residents have been encouraged to share their views on various aspects, including accessibility features, communal spaces, and the integration of the new blocks with the existing infrastructure which has directly informed the proposals. 2.2.3 The Applicant also engaged with the local MP, Helen Hayes, and a couple of local councillors at the behest of RNIB tenants to provide new homes to promote independent living for its Blind and Partially Sighted residents"     Seems like a very sensible and necessary proposal to me.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...