Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think ?35m is ridiculous, however it's a figure quoted by Sky so not necessarily fact. I imagine it's probably based on add ons, etc if true.


I'm liking the latest rumour I've heard though, which suggests that Torres asked the board to sign Carroll and then he'll stay. I've resigned myself to him going now but I'm still clinging on to any gimmer of hope.


The bullshit that has been flying around today is ridiculous.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm slightly worried that everyone on this thread

> will hide enough other people so that it just

> becomes a series of unanswered comments/questions

> into the ether!


But it does give you the choice to look at them or not and give you the chance to answer or ignore.

*jumps about excitedly*


OMG, I tapped his name into the DHFC website and his picture came up. I've seen him play!!! End of last year!! He WAS good too. Pity he's leaving.


Thanks for that Mockers - really decent of you. x


Everyone else: carry on arguing...I'm off for a while...

Hmm, maybe you're right actually. Nothing would surprise me wih a football player's contract these days, but they tend to give the players the power, rather than doing a club any god, so perhaps it's just more wishful thinking on my part.


In that case, it'l have to be a studs up challenge from Stevie G, to take him out for the rest of the season!


In all seriousness, we're losing a great player, but with the exception of a few moments of real class, he's not exactly set the world on fire since well before the World Cup, and that's not all down to injuries. Good luck to him, but I'm excited about 2 new strikers in for Liverpool, and the likes of Babel no longer hanging around, it's made me excited about the rest of the season. Not suggesting we're going to win anything, but having had the first half of the season that we've had, seeing an improvement, with some goals, will please the fans.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...