Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If my calculations are correct he made ?143.15

> million on sales therefore bringing in a net

> profit of 91.5 million. Not bad business.



Dont forget the salaries. They have a bigger impact on profit and loss than any other outgoing at a football club.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Right Manager Wrong Owners

>

> This article sums it up perfectly for me. If you

> can be arsed to read it you might begin to

> understand how I feel rather basing your opinions

> on incorrect figures that are thrown about in the

> tabloid press, which everyone seems to take as

> gospel.

>

> SP - of the numbers you've quoted, whats your

> source? Please can you also tell me if all of the

> "47" he sold were his buys?

>

> Really wish I'd not bothered coming back on here

> as all you all do is piss me off. Seems to be most

> people's objectives within this thread.


Slightly different take on it


http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/james-lawton-never-mind-the-rage-against-hicks-and-gillett-benitez-is-anfields-real-problem-1925454.html

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Zola got to go...lost the team and the fans and he

> knows it. We're a fickle bunch not like those

> mickeys.


Was a bit taken aback at the scoreline, but then again Wolves are on a bit of a roll, especially away from home (more points gained away than at Molineux)...it's still too tight to call, a couple of wins/losses and everything changes...like you said in an earlier post, Hammers will stay up because there are 3 worse teams than them.

like you said in an earlier post, Hammers will stay up because there are 3 worse teams than them.


Well that was the case too when Sheffield United went down (and a truly dreadful Fulham team stayed up). And there's often some really weird results in the final games of the season. It would not surprise me if Portsmouth had a good run now it is too late...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> and don't forget agents fees...can't recall

> exactly but didn't Pompey's accounts show

> ridiculous amounts...Ratty?


certainly did, and these were just the ones declared and not hidden in the Cayman Isles by Redknapp and Storrie!

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Zola got to go...lost the team and the fans and

> he

> > knows it. We're a fickle bunch not like those

> > mickeys.

>

> Was a bit taken aback at the scoreline, but then

> again Wolves are on a bit of a roll, especially

> away from home (more points gained away than at

> Molineux)...it's still too tight to call, a couple

> of wins/losses and everything changes...like you

> said in an earlier post, Hammers will stay up

> because there are 3 worse teams than them.


5 losses (all very one sided) in a row including two crucial six pointers at home. I think Dowie will give Hull some momentum. We've a better squad than most teams in the bottom half - the buck has to stop with Zola and Clarke. Zola interviewed last night sounded like a broken man way out of his depth...he's gone from a kind of mantra of smiley optimism to broken with no anger inbetween. I think he should go today, not sure if he will.

Rambo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anyone else enjoy seeing Liverpool on the

> slide?



Not really. But for those of us who remember just how much they completley dominated the domestic game in the 70s and especially 80s then at first (ie a few years ago) I was quite happy when they stopped winning league titles and cups almost unchallenged and gave others a chance! I don't believe they'll go into complete 'meltdown' as their heritage and 'brand' (pukes) and global fanbase is far too big for that. I think i'd be far happier if they won the Premiership next year than Man U or Chelsea say.

As I said yesterday, I saw the Bolton defeat and it has to be the worst performance I have seen from an Irons side in 25 years. Last night was as bad and the body language all over the pitch was wromg.


It is not even the case that we can play a more robust form of football to help our case, we simply do not have the players.


We sold badly and bought badly, I have no idea what players like Kovac, Franco, jimenez etc. are doing there, don't even get me started on Savio. This is Zola (and Nani's) team, bought in very difficult circumstances, yes, but a shower nonetheless.


Zola is a great guy and was a great player, his Ideas on how football should be played are admirable but this is the real world and it is time for him to leave.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rambo Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does anyone else enjoy seeing Liverpool on the

> > slide?

>

> Do bears shit in the woods?..


Yes, and apparently the Pope wears a funny hat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...