Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello all,


I'm James McAsh. I'm one of the three newly elected Labour councillors for Goose Green ward, along with Victoria Olisa and Charlie Smith.


I wanted to introduce myself to the East Dulwich Forum community, and to thank everyone who voted in yesterday's local elections. I know I speak for Victoria and Charlie as well when I say that it is a true honour and privilege to have your trust placed in us.


Regardless of whom you support politically, or whether you vote at all, we three Labour Councillors for Goose Green are keen to do whatever we can to help.


If you want to raise something with us then you can do any of the following:

- Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

- In person at a surgery on the 2nd and 4th Thursdays of the month at 7pm at East Dulwich Community Centre, Darrell Road

- On this thread!


In general, we are able to deal with things quicker if you are able to provide:

- Your address (or the address/location of where the issue relates)

- A brief outline of the problem

- Any communication you have already had with the council regarding the issue

- For longstanding issues, a brief timeline of event

- Photos, where relevant


Best wishes

James

Definitely big shoes to fill and I hope you will at least answer emails, get things moving and support the community because my past experience has shown Labour to come up short on the above whenever I?ve contacted them whereas James has always been on the ball and got results for me.
Like many, many people on the other thread, I was tremendously impressed by JB (shouldn't there be a tribute bench on GG or something? I'd subscribe!) even though he was not of a party for which I naturally have sympathy. But the proof of the pudding will be in the eating, these guys have won a free and fair election and gained the votes of a majority of residents, so let's see what they can do rather than start their tenure with a negative approach! The fact that he's already reaching out on the forum is a positive sign, no?

It would be good if you could talk to your colleagues in Dulwich Hill Ward (which also covers part of the old ED Ward) to see if they too would be prepared to join this forum. Goose Green and Dulwich Hill together cover much of what people think of as 'East Dulwich' (i.e SE22 and its immediately adjacent areas). As local issues are often not exactly ward specific (i.e. they cross ward boundaries) cooperative working may prove valuable in addressing constituent problems. Whilst this forum can in no way be representative (statistically) of East Dulwich views - it might offer at times a reasonable approximation of some of them.


Good luck to you, and while you may not wish to ape James Barber's policies, copying his diligence and care for his constituents (and his willingness to enter into debate) would serve you, and us, well. Much of what he did was anyway nothing to do with party, and everything to do with constituent need.

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Colville09, you were lucky to meet them during the

> campaign as I certainly didn?t.



They could hardly get round everybody, let alone find them all in!


I have heard both the "new" Labour councillors speak at the meeting where they were elected to stand as candidates, and I was very impressed with their knowledge, passion and commitment.

"Much of what he did was anyway nothing to do with party, and everything to do with constituent need."


I think this is why there are so many messages of thanks on his thread.


Other Labour councillors in London who apparently found themselves in conflict on local issues with Momentum's political views seemed to end up in a very unpleasant place indeed: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-42909757.


We'll have to wait to see what Mr McAsh can achieve.

James I hope you will a good job for your constituents. I also hope you?ll speak to your colleagues in neighbouring wards (particularly Rye Lane) and ask them to at least answer constituent emails if not also post on here. The most disappointing things about the Labour Party is they seem to take the electorate around here for granted.

alex_b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James I hope you will a good job for your

> constituents. I also hope you?ll speak to your

> colleagues in neighbouring wards (particularly Rye

> Lane) and ask them to at least answer constituent

> emails if not also post on here. The most

> disappointing things about the Labour Party is

> they seem to take the electorate around here for

> granted.


Yes unfortunately there are some areas where you could put a red rosette on a donkey and it would get elected -as my son keeps reminding me!

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Yes unfortunately there are some areas where you

> could put a red rosette on a donkey and it would

> get elected


Hope for you yet then. Funny how democracy's all fine until you don't get your own way, isn't it? Sure any suggestion that Brexit voters were ill-informed or misguided would be met with squeals of outrage from you, but when the vote doesn't go your way, out come the insults.


Extremely poor manners, by the way, to make a comment like that on a thread where a new councillor has come to introduce himself and tell people how to get in touch. I suggest you would do well to look at Mr.Barber's gracious and generous response to his defeat and try to learn something.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Yes unfortunately there are some areas where

> you

> > could put a red rosette on a donkey and it

> would

> > get elected

>

> Hope for you yet then. Funny how democracy's all

> fine until you don't get your own way, isn't it?

> Sure any suggestion that Brexit voters were

> ill-informed or misguided would be met with

> squeals of outrage from you, but when the vote

> doesn't go your way, out come the insults.

>

> Extremely poor manners, by the way, to make a

> comment like that on a thread where a new

> councillor has come to introduce himself and tell

> people how to get in touch. I suggest you would

> do well to look at Mr.Barber's gracious and

> generous response to his defeat and try to learn

> something.


Manners- I have had enough dealings with the Labour party to know that they themselves have none - have you never been to a council meeting?- if you had you will know that whatever is going on the Labour lot toe the party line regardless- AND they ONLY care about your vote....I am proud to say that I have NEVER voted Labour despite coming from the East End and from an immigrant family....

Not sure if this falls on your patch.


St Francis Park.


Just as I type this there are chain sawed tree fellers savaging the greenery that's "close" to the house boundaries that back on from St Francis Road.


I can slightly understand the need for doing it.... but seriously, mid to late Spring when birds are nesting? Come on guys, surely you can get this changed to late Autumn early winter when its easier to get along anyway. I take care of the area behind my house anyway usually doing it in October/ November.


Just a bit of common sense, rather than random destruction of local wildlife habitat at an important time of year for it.

Absolutely livid


Two young lads in ground control orange bibs. Asked them not to cut down the beautiful lilac that overhangs and I've purposefully left for a decade. Now butchered to the ground "because they have to"


Buddleaia butchered before it gets into flower, Elderflower butchered as it gets into flower.


They said they'd leave what was left.... then carried on after i went inside. I mentioned about it being nesting season.... they said they were checking as they were going along. Absolutely not from the 40 metre stretch I witnessed being hatcheted at speed.


Who authorised this? Who canvassed residents? Who's paying for this, because I can assure you, I don't condone or encourage wanton vandalism of natural habitat that not only encourages wildlife and allows birds to nest, but also provides security and privacy.


It's been done in past years and there has at least been some sensitivity. This year, hardly anything is left standing.


Absolute idiots. Fuming.

I believe Sainsbury's control the locking of the gates at either end, but I wasn't aware they were responsible for "managing" inside the park too.


And I'm not sure why Sainsburys would be the ones to "prune" the area between the park perimeter and the gardens it overlooks on St Francis Road. Surely that would be a council responsibility?


If a council representative could find out, that would be most helpful. We get allsorts of bird wildlife in our garden, a woodpecker visited just hours earlier, surely something can be done to stop management of trees, shrubs and habitat to be so destructively removed at such a crucial time of year.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It would be good if you could talk to your

> colleagues in Dulwich Hill Ward (which also covers

> part of the old ED Ward) to see if they too would

> be prepared to join this forum. Goose Green and

> Dulwich Hill together cover much of what people

> think of as 'East Dulwich' (i.e SE22 and its

> immediately adjacent areas). As local issues are

> often not exactly ward specific (i.e. they cross

> ward boundaries) cooperative working may prove

> valuable in addressing constituent problems.

> Whilst this forum can in no way be representative

> (statistically) of East Dulwich views - it might

> offer at times a reasonable approximation of some

> of them.

>

> Good luck to you, and while you may not wish to

> ape James Barber's policies, copying his diligence

> and care for his constituents (and his willingness

> to enter into debate) would serve you, and us,

> well. Much of what he did was anyway nothing to do

> with party, and everything to do with constituent

> need.



I second that. It would be nice for the Dulwich Hill Councillors to make themselves available via the forum and follow the example set by James Barber. This is the "East Dulwich" forum after all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...