Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Construction work has begun on the new health centre at the site of the old Dulwich hospital.


The local NHS is now looking at services that will be provided in the new health centre.


The 8 to 8 (Extended Primary Care) Service offers extra GP and nurse appointments from 8am to 8pm seven days week. The service is available at two locations in Southwark; Lister Primary Care Centre in Peckham and Spa Medical Centre in Bermondsey.


The NHS are proposing that from 2020, the service for the south of the borough, now based at the Lister Primary Care Centre, relocates to the planned new Dulwich Health Centre.


The NHS wants to hear what our patients and stakeholders views are about this proposed move. If you are registered at a GP practice in south Southwark (Camberwell, Peckham, Dulwich or Nunhead), please complete this short survey -


https://www.engage.england.nhs.uk/survey/28a33015/


The deadline for completing the survey is 22 June 2018. If you require a paper copy, please call 020 7525 7888.

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank you, have filled it out.

>

> The idea of being seen by a nurse rather than a

> doctor as asked in the survey is of concern.


I was recently offered an emergency appointment with the nurse practitioner for an acute condition at my GPs surgery and was very happy with the consultation and outcome

Slight biased as I asked for this.

Providing a service for the south of Southwark from the south of Southwark - the Lister is located in the middle - makes good sense.


I hope others will welcome the improvement in local GP services this represents.

Presumably being co located with SELDOC will also mean both services can cross support each other.


Hi BicBasher,

Lister is on 6 bus routes and 6 bus routes are very nearby to Dulwich Hospital. Lister has controlled parking and no parking for visitors. The Dulwich Hospital is currently not located in controlled parking but will have car parking for visitors. Lister is not near a train station but thE Dulwich centre will be.


hi se22cat,

I think they mean a nurse practitioner rather than nurse. Some practices offer paramedics, pharmacists, nurse practitioners as well as doctors. Even A&E use nurses for triage before access to doctors.

For aome reason I had thought this centre would continue to offer some hospital services and this would be based on local need. Will people be able to get blood tests etc.. as has been the case? What about physiotherapy and rehab? It sounds as though the function has moved on considerably from what was being stated a few years ago? Can anyone say what services will be on offer here?

>

> Hi BicBasher,

> Lister is on 6 bus routes and 6 bus routes are

> very nearby to Dulwich Hospital. Lister has

> controlled parking and no parking for visitors.

> The Dulwich Hospital is currently not located in

> controlled parking but will have car parking for

> visitors. Lister is not near a train station but

> thE Dulwich centre will be.


Of which only two stop outside the current hospital, which serve Peckham and Camberwell. The other 4 involve a walk either from East Dulwich Grove/Lordship Lane or Grove Vale/Melbourne Grove which largely serve East Dulwich. Not as great as having six direct bus routes outside the centre. This leaves disabled or older patients either having to wait for a 37 or 42 or slowly walk up the road.


While car access is welcomed, there will be a certain percentage who use public transport.

This asks 2 questions only (really) - have you ever been referred to the Lister and would you mind being seen by a nurse instead of a doctor? There are some 'how was it for you' questions if you have been referred to The Lister, but no probing questions to steer answers into useful areas (waiting times, cleanliness, ease of access, effect and so on). Most of the questionnaire is taken by demographics, but whilst it asks race and sexuality it doesn't ask age or any disability - both of which are relevant, I would have thought, to access issues, nor does it use any form of postcode check to see comparative proximity to The Lister or Dulwich Hospital. Or, in other words, it's a pretty useless questionnaire, designed to show consultation has taken place without really undertaking any meaningful information collection. If the NHS has actually pad a consultant to derive useful information for them, then they've been robbed! This is, at best, a weak PR exercise.

I don?t think the questionnaire is that bad, the ?how was it for you? questions give greater scope for a more detailed, nuanced answer than a question such as ?On a scale of 1 to 10, how clean did you find the facility? which gives no scope for the ?yes but ...? answer. Had I ever attended at Lister, I would welcome the opportunity of answering the more open ended questions.


Anyway, regardless of whether it?s a well designed questionnaire or not, or whether it?s a mere PR stunt, we should not lose site of the fact that within a couple of years (or so!), at last, there will be a brand new health facility in the area.

I don?t think the questionnaire is that bad, the ?how was it for you? questions give greater scope for a more detailed, nuanced answer than a question such as ?On a scale of 1 to 10, how clean did you find the facility? which gives no scope for the ?yes but ...? answer. Had I ever attended at Lister, I would welcome the opportunity of answering the more open ended questions.


Agreed that open-ended questions can elucidate a richer response - but please note (I speak as a former member of the MRS) (1) This is normally done in the context of a framework of more directed questions, either using a Likert scale (i.e. 1-5) or simple binary questions or other analysis context, and (2) proper data analysis of open ended questions, which, for a piece of quantitative research requires post coding (rather than pre-coding, this isn't about postcodes!) is difficult and expensive. I'm willing to bet that this group have neither the skill nor the money to use this information in any sensible way.


Without demographic information on e.g. age (although apparently my response will be analysed on the basis of whether I'm a lesbian or not) and particularly, in this context, disability this 'research' isn't frankly, worth a candle.


Nor is the self selecting nature of the research sample capable of supplying information of any statistical significance.


Not that there are any opposition councillors anymore, but someone should challenge the 'local NHS' if they make any claims whatsoever as a 'result' of this exercise - which I suspect has the clear fingerprints of those wanting to make these changes in Southwark come what may - which is all about re-use of public property within our bit of SE London. That may actually be just the NHS - but I have my doubts.

I would much rather be seen by a nurse (and many of them are specialist practitioners) who will have more time to listen, be caring, and give advice than a Dr who has 6 mins allocated appt time and is tired and stressed and rushed off their feet. A nurse will refer and ask for advice from a Dr if she/he is concerned.
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...