Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Some older rugby fans might be interested in a

> programme tonight on the Lions 1971 visit to NZ.

> It's on BBC1 Wales @ 10.35pm. However it is on

> other BBC channels next week too.

>

> Good luck Wales tomorrow though whoever wins I'd

> like to see them win it outright. One for the NH.

>

> I attach 'My Story', an amateur effort written

> this summer for the purposes of an annual family

> event. A mixture of fact and fiction. I hope it

> amuses someone.



Very good Declan. Nice to read.

Ed Morrison, head of elite referee development at the Rugby Football Union, confirmed on Radio 5 live that referee Alain Rolland was "100% right" to send off Warburton, adding that dropping a player from shoulder level is automatic red card.


Wales should have won regardless. They missed some kicks.

Quite agree with AM. The ref didn't miss those kicks.


I've been trying to find the rules on red cards in these circumstances and came across a memorandum issued in Feb on dangerous tackles on the IRB website, referring to high tackles specifically, but mentioning tip tackles.


The purpose of this Memorandum is to emphasise that as with tip tackles, they must be dealt with severely by Referees and all those involved in the off-field disciplinary process.


It is recognised of course, as with other types of illegal and/or foul play, depending on the circumstances of the high tackle, the range of sanctions extends from a penalty kick to the player receiving a red card. An illegal high tackle involving a stiff arm or swinging arm to the head of the opponent, with no regard to the player?s safety, bears all the hallmarks of an action which should result in a red card or a yellow card being seriously considered.


Referees and Citing Commissioners should not make their decisions based on what they consider was the intention of the offending player. Their decision should be based on an objective assessment (as per Law 10.4(e)) of the overall circumstances of the tackle.



Given tip tackles are more dangerous, Ed Morrison's comment is not surprising.

A ref's forum


Someone needs to defend him........


I think what upset most people (on TV) was their expectations of what the game would be like were ruined. What we got was a different but still exceptional game, mostly from Wales. Could 14 menovercome the disadvantage, and how?


"Rolland u've had a shocker.... Not the first time either!!! Were not here to watch u...." This is what Mark Cueto Tweeted about the red card. He could have been talking about England.

I think it's worth a punt. I'm surprised it's so much in a two horse race. The French team has great players. If they click on the day they could easily push the AB's all the way. Everyone has been saying they always have one great performance, and it certainly hasn't happened yet. Maybe Sunday.

I backed France from the start at 13 to 1. I'm a bit miffed that I could have waited until the final and still got 7s. I also for the record had a tenner on ireland before anyone asks how many other teams I backed.


Think 4 to 1 might be more realistic odds for the final. France are the All Blacks world cup bogey team after all. They would probably rather have played Wales?




this is interesting as the commentator says before the game:


"France are still experimenting - trying to find the back division that will recreate that traditional French flair...."


Sounds familiar but 43 french points later....and after being 24-10 down. France triumph.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
    • Some people are all of the above. Would happily ban them, or send them to training school
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...