Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am really sorry to be writing this, as in past years I and others have posted on here to say how well kept the park was and how lovely it looked.


However this year everywhere is full of weeds, including the enclosed Sexby Garden, and the whole place looks really run down, apart from the beds at the main entrance and the plants round the old fountain (?) near the lake.


Has the park lost funding, or have staff been cut?


It is very sad to see.

sunbob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where's the walled garden? Used to go daily with

> children but less now so I can't remember that

> part.



It's in the park quite near to the lake. Actually it may not be walled, I may be confusing it with the one in Brockwell Park, but it is enclosed. It is the Sexby Garden.


It was renovated with lottery funding a few years back.


It was very well planted, there are pergolas with climbing plants and until recently it all looked lovely.


It is now a really horrible mess, as is the pond in the middle, although obviously there are still flowering plants as well.


Many of the beds in there, and also elsewhere in the park, seem to be infested with Mare's Tail, as well as many other weeds.


It looks as if it would take many days of work to get back to looking good, and the longer it is left like this the longer it will take.


There is a Friends of Peckham Rye Park group. Can anyone shed any light on what has happened?


This is far worse than a bit of damage to grass caused by the festival, in my opinion.

alex_b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Friends of Peckham Rye Park has a website at

> http://www.peckhamryepark.org/opportunities/


Thanks, I just found them on Twitter.


If any of them are reading this, could they (or the relevant councillor) comment?

Thanks so much, I don't mean to take this off topic but i haven't seen any horsetail this year, just an amazing medicine but yes very invasive. Thank you, I'll get overthere and pick some.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/whisperingearth.co.uk/2010/06/12/horsetail-ancient-wonder-modern-medicine/amp/

I totally agree with you Sue; as a keen gardener myself I have really noticed the lack of maintenance over the past few months. It had occurred to me to pop into the park office and enquire as to the reason but I suspect it is because they no longer have their head gardener - the lady was always out in the park doing something and whilst she was around all was well. Very sad that is no longer the case.
I have posted on another thread that using hiring fees for the park to then maintain it would be a cost effective way to go - those closest to the park both being those most to suffer from a weekend or two's disruption - but then to benefit from having a well maintained park close to them to enjoy. Most pain: most gain.
I was speaking to one of the gardeners heroically battling the weeds in the Sexby Garden . He told me that they now have only 5 gardeners .Down from 30 or 40 ,I'm unable to remember which .And I don't know over what period the decline has taken place .
I noticed the very sorry state of the sexby gardens. I was wondering if Southwark Council could use some of the money it has just earned from hiring out the park to employ maybe a seasonal gardener to help with getting the gardens back to its former glory?

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was speaking to one of the gardeners heroically

> battling the weeds in the Sexby Garden . He told

> me that they now have only 5 gardeners .Down from

> 30 or 40 ,I'm unable to remember which .And I

> don't know over what period the decline has taken

> place .



It seems to me that it is only over the last year.


I'm sure it was nothing like as bad as this last summer, in fact my recollection is that it was pretty well maintained at that time.


I'm wondering if it's just lack of staff or lack of qualified/experienced/knowledgeable staff. If the head gardener has sadly left that would make things worse, as at least presumably she could tell her team what they needed to do if it wasn't obvious to them.

From a quick look at Southwark's budget book they've had to find ?1,230,000 in savings from the parks & open spaces budget over the last two years (c 18.5% of the total budget they had in 2016/17):


* 2017/18: ?410,000 (https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/4421/Environment%20and%20Social%20Regeneration%20Budget%20Book%202017-18.pdf - p32)


* 2018/19: ?820,000 (https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/6432/Budget%20book%202018-19%20-%20Environment%20and%20Social%20Regeneration.pdf - p33)


Some context on the general picture across local authorities here in case it's of interest: https://www.local.gov.uk/about/news/council-funding-be-further-cut-half-over-next-two-years-lga-warns.

Oh, a bit of further clarification that might be useful. Maintenance and staff costs etc will be revenue budget (essentially paid for from the council's current account) and major works to the fabric of the park will be from the capital budget. There are strict rules about what councils can spend revenue and capital on, which can restrict the choices they can make.

Renata Hamvas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Sue, I'll make enquiries about this. I think

> the grounds maintenance company have been taken

> over by another one and this may be the root of

> the inadequate weed control/clearance.

> I'll get back to you.




Thanks Renata.


That sounds like bad news. Surely they must have a contract laying down standards to be met? Have they sacked staff from the previous maintenance company, to save money?


It isn't just weeds, although they are currently all over most of the beds in the park, it is general lack of any care, eg grass paths in the sexby garden do not appear to have been mowed, and the pond in that garden is an absolute mess.


It all reminds me of when parks departments were made to go out to tender, and lost their permanent staff. Places like The Rookery in Streatham went downhill really fast because - I imagine - councils went for the lowest tender, with predictable results.

Houseoflego Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Sue,

> You could always volunteer for helping out. The

> friends of Peckham rye are just a volunteers i

> think so you can't complain to them. But they have

> really helped to improve the park.

>

> http://www.peckhamryepark.org/opportunities/



Good idea, but much as I would like to I just don't have the time!


ETA: And I had no intention of complaining to the Friends, I just wondered if they could shed any light and/or put pressure on the people in the council responsible for the park upkeep.


In any case, I don't think it should be down to volunteers to maintain a public space.

Renata


Do you know what the spend priorities are for The Rye and Peckham Rye Park? I would have guessed H&S issues (like dangerous trees); routine maintenance (keeping it in a decent state) and then improvements (such as carved trees and granite areas)? But I'm not sure there aren't different budget heads - so that 'improvements' may be done whilst routine maintenance is ignored.


Also - do hire fees etc. go back into park budgets, or are they taken off to other funds?


That whole area is one hell of an amenity - but it won't manage itself and the cost of 'recovering it' (if left to rack and ruin) will be far higher than routinely maintaining it.


We are very lucky in ED and its surrounds with our green spaces - be it parks, woodland, common land or cemeteries. It almost compensates for the lack of public transport (compared with much of the rest of London). We cannot afford for any part of that benefit to degrade.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...