Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

For your reading here is Huguenot's original post refering to the horse and Syphilite which was originally removed from a thread about East Dulwich Swimming pool. I believe it is now more apt in this thread. Weirdos.



Well I imagine he's supporting your view rather than tendering disrespect. ;-)


I'd find it a bit concerning however, Domitianus was historically a pretender to the Roman throne rather than the real thing. He even went so far as to having coins printed in his own likeness to reinforce the claim. Cheeky monkey.


To have his support is a bit like having a renowned bullsh*tter as your best mate. It rubs off..


I'm considering whether he's related to Incitatus whose major claim to fame, apart from being ridden by a Syphilite, was being an equine senator. It seems unlikely, given the penetration of latin scholars generally into society, that we have two on this forum. Admin, can you alleviate us of this pedantic burden?

Alright already, I?m a horse, I?m Gaius Julius Caesar Germanicus Caligula?s horse, I throw lavish banquets in my Ivory lined stables and enjoy a rich diet of gold laced oats and pearls dissolved in wine. I?m a high priest with my own Temple-, which is nice-, and I almost made Senator. My Guv?nor was a bit of a munter and a nutter, if you mentioned hairy Goats (he, Caligula looked like one) in his presence then you were ?brown bread?. Caligula got his though; in true Roman style he was stabbed loads of times especially in the groin by lots of people.
Does anyone think the writers of the Archers are setting up a plot line that will come to a head in 20 years when Brian dies and Rory is left with the lion's share of his inheritance and owes the farm? Which put's annoying Adam's nose out of joint, and Alice is left surprised/resentful and upset that she had a brother she never knew about?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dunstans Road  comes under Dulwich Hill SNT- you can get their details on the Met Police website . I know that the Police are often patrolling Dawson Hights. Please contact them,
    • No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? I don’t want people to feel like they need special clothes just to walk or cycle. If you have lights and reflectors and you’re on well lit city streets, there is no reason why drivers shouldn’t be able to see you, assuming of course, that they're driving with due care and attention. But yes, if there are lots of people without lights, that should be addressed. I suspect in part, it's the change over in seasons and the fact that people are getting caught out by how early it's getting dark now (obviously no excuse).
    • Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com   please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE
    • What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...