Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Right East Dulwich, I need some help. Following another dispute in the car this morning on the way to Furniture Village I need to know what radio station I should be listening to.


I am 33 and I think that is a difficult age for radio listening.


I am told by my girlfriend that I am too young to be listening to Magic / Heart and the constant loop of Adele and Dido songs on repeat.....but I insist she is too old to be listening to Capital / Radio 1 more favoured by teenagers.


So what is the solution.....?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20390-radio-station-help/
Share on other sites

Radio four in the morning .., with the option of switching to capital when humphreya et al get too bombastic. Johnny vaughn is actuslly very funny and a breath of fresh air .LBC warning : it's the radio equivalent of the daily mail. Lots of closed minds, open mouths and celebration of ignorance. Avoid .

BBC Radio London 94.9fm


Or


BBC Radio 4


Or


Radio 2


But if your just a plain old "Knobhead" then try KISS 100 FM


(it will affirm your meaningless position in life)


NETTE:-S


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sent from my MacBook though i've lost my i-phone but a new one's on it's way.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James O Brien LBC 10 -1 A proper bloke. with an

> open mind who doesnt always go on about Immigrsnts

> and Benefit Cheats


I like a bit of James O'B - as long as he isn't on one of his tedious liberalist soap boxes. LBC/BBC London/R4 for me.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...