Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The OP has certainly opened a debate (they didn't want to open a debate)!? about the leave/remain question on the forum on the 1st October and not been on here since 8th October.


Maybe they are too tired after distributing leaflets and going on a march.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What on Earth is wrong with both of you (and

> civilservant) We?ve had all the crowing and PR

> hype, what great turn outs, evidence of a

> groundswell that the British people have changed

> their minds etc.

>

> Unfortunately, as embarrassing as you may find

> this, the pictures of those who participated in

> the marches do not reflect the multicultural

> nature of Britain. Fact. Not my fault. There may

> be many pictures that I haven?t seen that are more

> balanced but I haven?t seen them in the papers, on

> TV or on Google images.

>

> Why is it racist to question the seemingly

> unrepresentative nature of the public record of

> the marches?

>

> Rhetorical question - I don?t expect any sensible

> answers


oooh keano, the poor darkies need you to speak up for them, is that it?

take it from me, mate, sometimes they're actually able to make up their minds for themselves, believe it or not


you have the temerity, the absolute arsiness, to ask what the matter is with me, do you?

if you play the race card, then come on, at least have the guts to play it through to the end, don't try and duck out, like a lily-livered nincompoop, you prat!

civilservant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What on Earth is wrong with both of you (and

> > civilservant) We?ve had all the crowing and PR

> > hype, what great turn outs, evidence of a

> > groundswell that the British people have

> changed

> > their minds etc.

> >

> > Unfortunately, as embarrassing as you may find

> > this, the pictures of those who participated in

> > the marches do not reflect the multicultural

> > nature of Britain. Fact. Not my fault. There

> may

> > be many pictures that I haven?t seen that are

> more

> > balanced but I haven?t seen them in the papers,

> on

> > TV or on Google images.

> >

> > Why is it racist to question the seemingly

> > unrepresentative nature of the public record of

> > the marches?

> >

> > Rhetorical question - I don?t expect any

> sensible

> > answers

>

> oooh keano, the poor darkies need you to speak up

> for them, is that it?

> take it from me, mate, sometimes they're actually

> able to make up their minds for themselves,

> believe it or not

>

> you have the temerity, the absolute arsiness, to

> ask what the matter is with me, do you?

> if you play the race card, then come on, at least

> have the guts to play it through to the end, don't

> try and duck out, like a lily-livered nincompoop,

> you prat!



Oh oh, the edf equivalent of the nutter who sits next to you on the bus

I didn?t think it was possible for to make yourself look like more of an idiot over this Keano, but well done, you?ve managed to!


Shame you?ve got so little self-awareness that you don?t understand how stupid you?ve been, but I guess back in your day people could take a joke and knew their place, eh?

What is the ethnic makeup of the UK as a whole and how does this compare with the Peoples Vote march. I think you might find it's very similar to be honest. The Peoples Vote march was a UK wide march held in London.


White British is 87% of the UK population.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_the_United_Kingdom


Edit: When you have a subsection of the population as big as 700,000+ then it begins to approximate the real population makeup I'd say (not a statistics guy)

As ever, haters gonna hate. You can imagine the sneering Brexiter remarks had there been a disproportionately high number of 'non-white' faces, Londonistan etc. As John says, it was representative of the country as a whole, groups from Orkney to Cornwall came, all-inclusive, all getting along, all having a good time. It's quite clear the Brixiters are rattled by the huge numbers that showed up, it's a game changer, well done everyone who went, it was a fantastic day...

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "game changer". Really?


If parliament votes against Theresa May's deal and we are left in no-mans land with parliament not wanting no deal then maybe, maybe not.


I don't know where we're headed, May might be gone in a week, it's all volatile.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, so not a "game changer" then!


I'm still on the fence over that :)


Theresa May today was supposed to have said ?None of this is about me. It?s all about you.? other reports say the quote was "Brexit talks are not about me or my personal fortunes" either way she's feeling the pressure..

Notice Chris Grayling puts party before country in the below quote ...


"One of Theresa May?s key allies has called on Conservative MPs to show ?calm, level heads? on Brexit during a potentially treacherous political week for the prime minister, insisting that a deal acceptable to a majority of the party is still possible."

JohnL Wrote:

----------------------------------------------------

>

> I don't know where we're headed, May might be gone

> in a week, it's all volatile.


There was a leadership vote, May won, the party needs to respect the vote and the will of the party membership.

How dare they think they can change their mind, they're nothing but enemies of the party, quislings, a betrayal of democracy!...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...