Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The OP has certainly opened a debate (they didn't want to open a debate)!? about the leave/remain question on the forum on the 1st October and not been on here since 8th October.


Maybe they are too tired after distributing leaflets and going on a march.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What on Earth is wrong with both of you (and

> civilservant) We?ve had all the crowing and PR

> hype, what great turn outs, evidence of a

> groundswell that the British people have changed

> their minds etc.

>

> Unfortunately, as embarrassing as you may find

> this, the pictures of those who participated in

> the marches do not reflect the multicultural

> nature of Britain. Fact. Not my fault. There may

> be many pictures that I haven?t seen that are more

> balanced but I haven?t seen them in the papers, on

> TV or on Google images.

>

> Why is it racist to question the seemingly

> unrepresentative nature of the public record of

> the marches?

>

> Rhetorical question - I don?t expect any sensible

> answers


oooh keano, the poor darkies need you to speak up for them, is that it?

take it from me, mate, sometimes they're actually able to make up their minds for themselves, believe it or not


you have the temerity, the absolute arsiness, to ask what the matter is with me, do you?

if you play the race card, then come on, at least have the guts to play it through to the end, don't try and duck out, like a lily-livered nincompoop, you prat!

civilservant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What on Earth is wrong with both of you (and

> > civilservant) We?ve had all the crowing and PR

> > hype, what great turn outs, evidence of a

> > groundswell that the British people have

> changed

> > their minds etc.

> >

> > Unfortunately, as embarrassing as you may find

> > this, the pictures of those who participated in

> > the marches do not reflect the multicultural

> > nature of Britain. Fact. Not my fault. There

> may

> > be many pictures that I haven?t seen that are

> more

> > balanced but I haven?t seen them in the papers,

> on

> > TV or on Google images.

> >

> > Why is it racist to question the seemingly

> > unrepresentative nature of the public record of

> > the marches?

> >

> > Rhetorical question - I don?t expect any

> sensible

> > answers

>

> oooh keano, the poor darkies need you to speak up

> for them, is that it?

> take it from me, mate, sometimes they're actually

> able to make up their minds for themselves,

> believe it or not

>

> you have the temerity, the absolute arsiness, to

> ask what the matter is with me, do you?

> if you play the race card, then come on, at least

> have the guts to play it through to the end, don't

> try and duck out, like a lily-livered nincompoop,

> you prat!



Oh oh, the edf equivalent of the nutter who sits next to you on the bus

I didn?t think it was possible for to make yourself look like more of an idiot over this Keano, but well done, you?ve managed to!


Shame you?ve got so little self-awareness that you don?t understand how stupid you?ve been, but I guess back in your day people could take a joke and knew their place, eh?

What is the ethnic makeup of the UK as a whole and how does this compare with the Peoples Vote march. I think you might find it's very similar to be honest. The Peoples Vote march was a UK wide march held in London.


White British is 87% of the UK population.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_the_United_Kingdom


Edit: When you have a subsection of the population as big as 700,000+ then it begins to approximate the real population makeup I'd say (not a statistics guy)

As ever, haters gonna hate. You can imagine the sneering Brexiter remarks had there been a disproportionately high number of 'non-white' faces, Londonistan etc. As John says, it was representative of the country as a whole, groups from Orkney to Cornwall came, all-inclusive, all getting along, all having a good time. It's quite clear the Brixiters are rattled by the huge numbers that showed up, it's a game changer, well done everyone who went, it was a fantastic day...

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "game changer". Really?


If parliament votes against Theresa May's deal and we are left in no-mans land with parliament not wanting no deal then maybe, maybe not.


I don't know where we're headed, May might be gone in a week, it's all volatile.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, so not a "game changer" then!


I'm still on the fence over that :)


Theresa May today was supposed to have said ?None of this is about me. It?s all about you.? other reports say the quote was "Brexit talks are not about me or my personal fortunes" either way she's feeling the pressure..

Notice Chris Grayling puts party before country in the below quote ...


"One of Theresa May?s key allies has called on Conservative MPs to show ?calm, level heads? on Brexit during a potentially treacherous political week for the prime minister, insisting that a deal acceptable to a majority of the party is still possible."

JohnL Wrote:

----------------------------------------------------

>

> I don't know where we're headed, May might be gone

> in a week, it's all volatile.


There was a leadership vote, May won, the party needs to respect the vote and the will of the party membership.

How dare they think they can change their mind, they're nothing but enemies of the party, quislings, a betrayal of democracy!...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...