Jump to content

I rather like 'chains' coming to East Dulwich (Lounged)


Recommended Posts

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry just re-read this and realised that my

> earlier post was supposed to read: ?Why is it not

> appealing??



Because it's tatty. While it may hold a certain charm for some of us, in reality it will turn off lots of potential customers. I'm surprised that we're even debating this point.

Dear Caron,


You really should try Dulwich Books on Croxted Road, it is just fabulous. I spend hours in there, the imaginative window displays, engaging layout and terrific staff just draw you in. I know it might seem a little out of the way for some in East Dulwich, but it is well worth a trip. A local treasure. Chener is a useful resource, but it could be fabulous.

The only chains I like are Lidl cos its cheap and the fresh food is better than the others, WHSmiths because they sell a huge range of weird magazines you can't get anywhere else and Woolies cos it's ... well Woolies.


Hate the rest of them.


Has anyone read Tescopoly? Interesting book.

Chener books looks horrible, and is a depressing place to shop. Who'd want to browse there? The Village bookshop is fab, full of interesting books, in an inviting cheerful environment. The way the books are displayed is actually helpful and inspiring, guiding you towards books you might otherwise not have considered or even heard of, instead of resembling a particularly underfunded public library as Chener's does. For children's books Tales on Half Moon Lane is also an amazing example of a perfect local, independent bookshop, and is thriving, with its welcoming atmosphere, displays that make you want to buy the books and extremely helpful staff.

I'll agree that Chener looks tatty beyond need AND the perpetually leaking roof didn't help - but beyond that surface I think it's pretty good


The big table with what I imagine are the recommendations of the shop is usually pretty well thought out and the stock generally is both good and accessible. By accessible I mean I can browse the shelves, not "easy to read"


I think the Village bookshop IS fab but is also very very poky and uncomfortable if more than a few people are in there

Having previously lived in North London, I think it's fantastic that there are so many independent chemists' in this part of London. Go, Macey's. And yes, put your money where your mouth is -

Chains - Foxton's no, Caff? Nero yes,

Independents - Chandelier no, Neverending Story Bookshop yes.

If you were a shop landlord would you


a) rent it to some grocers who might close down in a week


b) get good rent from a chain on a long lease whos less likely to go bust.

The rent will never be cheap enough for new indies I dont see landlords

reducing rents so that they can please the people of Lordship lane

with a organic coffee shop


I know what I would choose if I were in those shoes.


kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? is on the money. The rents argument is the

> stongest against this trend. The big boys have

> such buying power and arrogance - look at Nero;

> they've swaggered into town without even bothering

> to sort out their planning permission. And

> Foxtons' two fingered gesture of a shop front

> speaks volumes for their attempts to integrate

> into the community.

>

> Support the shops and eateries that are already

> here - the good ones will survive and thrive, the

> dross will be replaced by new indies, if the rent

> is still cheap enough.

I'm all for Iceland instead of M&S food for two reasons


1) The cost means that not just well-to-do have a place to shop

2) Nothing M&S sells can't be bought elsewhere on the lane (and better too) (and cheaper as well)

Not directly on topic (but the owners currently live in East Dulwich and have done for years) Bookseller Crow in Crystal Palace is a fantastic independent bookshop-lovely staff and extremly knowledgeable.


Try them if you are up that way ,or even if you are not go and try them anyway.

Jeremy


I guess that is partly true although many people love to buy meat from M&S, spuds etc - all genuinely overpriced (as opposed to a perception of being overpriced)


But if people are genuinely clamouring for M&S ready-meals then that is another problem :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...