Jump to content

Recommended Posts

herrd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxy, the bottles were there long before this

> thread made it to EDF...


That's My very Point...


People do things to get Publicity.


Who ever is doing this knows this.


Thinks they are like 'Banksy'


people here are treating them like Banksy


Last time I will post on the subject.


Fox

people here are treating them like Banksy


Last time I will post on the subject.


Fox


No, unless I'm mistaken, most people here are treating him/her like a prat who pisses in bottles in a mildly disgusting/perplexing manner, and it happens to be amusing to post about. Banksy? Sounds like you're the one elevating urine to art. Maybe get a job on the Turner Prize judging panel?

Bottles on Display


I thought that we can catch this man,

so I sat down and devised this plan.

I will park my Camper near to the wall,

To keep my calm and not loose my cool.


It's getting dusk so hard to see clearly,

must keep awake and not get dreary.

Here comes a car, it came to a stop.

his car is in the way I can?t see a lot


Peeping out from behind my curtain,

just what he is doing I cant be certain..

He has come up to the door of my van,

I wonder then, what is now his plan.


A knock on the door, I have no choice,

I must open, as I can hear his voice.

He stood there holding onto my door,

To face him, I could fall through the floor.


?Excuse me lady, sorry to disturb tonight?

? I have got no empty bottles for my plight.?

? I really don't know what else I can do,?

Do you think I could use your Campers Loo?

  • 2 weeks later...

Can someone explain what this pee bottles is about.

I guess is about p.....y

Young pet white dark hairy fur blue eyes

Was worrying to see poor animal. Didn't want to tell

me who did it but is this what I saw this poor little thing

hidding her tummy. Probably is not black fur but the opposite !

who knows.

Assuming that the bottles do contain Pee? (& I am not offering to do a test ... smell, taste ... or otherwise!)

what law/by-law is actually being broken?

Littering? Certainly.

Anti-Social Behaviour? Almost certainly.

But is there a specific regulation about human waste (as yet unproven) being dumped in the street?


It seems that gentle polite ribbing has not deterred the culprit yet, so what actually can be done to make the point in a way that will be taken seriously?

As it really needs to stop. Any hint of warm weather or spillage will make this a very unpleasant habit.

ChristopherH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thats never pee in the comfort bottle!



No, the comfort bottle arrived a couple of days before the others did...


I suspect the comfort bottle was left by somebody entirely different... perhaps someone who read this thread and wanted to add to the problem?


what a joker *sigh*

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I still don't think the colour's right for urine,

> even if the person was rather dehydrated. And all

> the bottles are full... does the driver keep the

> bottle in his car until it's full?



Have a look at the colour of these ones:

http://mobile.corkindependent.com/news/newslistitem/4959

http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/lawshall_more_than_60_bottles_of_urine_found_in_suffolk_village_1_1182461

http://www.flickriver.com/groups/truckerbombs/pool/interesting/

http://www.flickr.com/groups/truckerbombs/pool/page2/

I think the Cork lads have it right...


"There have also been rumours of the urine being used as fertiliser or indeed, as part of research into the generation of hydrogen fuel from the urine, but these are unconfirmed."


... yes, it's the ED green party R&D dept.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the Cork lads have it right...

>

> "There have also been rumours of the urine being

> used as fertiliser or indeed, as part of research

> into the generation of hydrogen fuel from the

> urine, but these are unconfirmed."

>

> ... yes, it's the ED green party R&D dept.


I'm surprised ED's allotment owners aren't fighting over this stuff.. all those free nitrates. And if the cab driver has kidney disease or an STD, plenty veg-friendly other minerals too. And all 100% natural.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...