Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Whenever middle class English folk discuss hip-hop / gansta rap, I can't help but be reminded of the opening scene in Office Space where Michael Bolton surreptitiously turns down the music on the stereo and winds up his car window as he nears the black council worker raking the leaves at the road verge.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Come on, most of these aren't Gangsta

>

>

> how about

>

> ..I ain't new to this - Ice T


True, but these tunes, which laid the foundation for Gangsta Rap, are valid as DJKQ allowed them in her first post statement. Now what we need are threads on Swing Beat, Go Go, Upfront & Electro funk music.

Rakim is the G.O.A.T. Fair play djkq, imho 'paid in full' laid the foundations of house. 1986, my mates are break dancing down town to Rakim et al. 1987, they switch seamlessly to house, year zero for dance music.


Hip hop in general. Nas, wu tang clan, talib kweli, outkast,kanye,lupe fiasco, pharoahe monch. All good in the hood.

grabot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rakim is the G.O.A.T. Fair play djkq, imho 'paid

> in full' laid the foundations of house. 1986, my

> mates are break dancing down town to Rakim et al.

> 1987, they switch seamlessly to house, year zero

> for dance music.

>

> Hip hop in general. Nas, wu tang clan, talib

> kweli, outkast,kanye,lupe fiasco, pharoahe monch.

> All good in the hood.


Trying to rewrite history doesn't quite cut it with me, grabot. To say 1987 was year zero for dance music showed a lack of knowledge for dance music in general. Even in 1987. Rakim had nothing to do with house music. Not even laying its foundations. His music was hardly ground breaking in 1987 and far too commercial for my own taste.


Break dancing happened in London during the early eighties. Well before 1987, breakdancing was passe in the clubs.


jelly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Urgh. I can't stand 'gangsta rap'. It's larded

> with aggression and misogyny. Hardly the kind of

> thing you should play around young and/or

> impressionable kids.


Worse than that, rap producers sampled the classic tunes in order to gain musical integrity.


I'm sure you won't agree with what I've just said. But then, I still have my huge pile of Blues & Soul magazines and music collection to backup my extensive knowledge of music around the time. Argue at your peril.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> grabot Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Rakim is the G.O.A.T. Fair play djkq, imho

> 'paid

> > in full' laid the foundations of house. 1986,

> my

> > mates are break dancing down town to Rakim et

> al.

> > 1987, they switch seamlessly to house, year

> zero

> > for dance music.

> >

> > Hip hop in general. Nas, wu tang clan, talib

> > kweli, outkast,kanye,lupe fiasco, pharoahe

> monch.

> > All good in the hood.

>

> Trying to rewrite history doesn't quite cut it

> with me, grabot. To say 1987 was year zero for

> dance music showed a lack of knowledge for dance

> music in general. Even in 1987. Rakim had nothing

> to do with house music. Not even laying its

> foundations. His music was hardly ground breaking

> in 1987 and far too commercial for my own taste.

>

> Break dancing happened in London during the early

> eighties. Well before 1987, breakdancing was passe

> in the clubs.

>

> jelly Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Urgh. I can't stand 'gangsta rap'. It's larded

> > with aggression and misogyny. Hardly the kind

> of

> > thing you should play around young and/or

> > impressionable kids.

>

> Worse than that, rap producers sampled the classic

> tunes in order to gain musical integrity.

>

> I'm sure you won't agree with what I've just said.

> But then, I still have my huge pile of Blues &

> Soul magazines and music collection to backup my

> extensive knowledge of music around the time.

> Argue at your peril.



I'll argue against both of you


Eric B & Rakim had nothing to do with house music at any point in their career.


The music they made between 85-87 was absolutely groundbreaking and paved the way for (and arguably invented) modern hip hop.


The debut album was influential in so many ways, not least because of the use of james brown and other funk samples; and rakim's lyrical content and flow are still regarded as the best ever. His MC'ing on the first two albums, on tracks like 'my melody', 'i know you got soul', 'eric b is president', 'follow the leader', 'lyrics of fury', microphone fiend' still sound fresh today, over 25 years later- he's regarded as the best ever MC by his peers and fans of hip hop.


And they definitely weren't a commercial act, far from it- the debut album didn't penetrate the top 50 in the US or UK and it was only a remix of the 'paid in full' single by british producers/remixers Cold Cut in 1988 that brought them any kind of success in this country, and even that didn't trouble the top 10.


I don't have a pile of magazines to refer to, just my own records, memory and the internet for help with exact dates and chart positions.

My comments are based on my memories too, rather than an knowledge of music or history. But, I do have a sketchy memory of my cool friends, they wore Italian tracksuits and the like, moving seamlessly from hip hip to house and I recall hearing similarities between them at the time. I didn't, however grow up amongst London hipsters [i never have and never will own a pork pie hat], Chicago house didn't make it up north and I was listening to rubbish at the time; a big part of me feels that I missed out! My apparently controversial statement was designed to elicit a response as I am interested in people's personal experience of this period, rather than a dry historical treatsie. Also, loved the 30's rap, amazing.

grabot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My comments are based on my memories too, rather

> than an knowledge of music or history. But, I do

> have a sketchy memory of my cool friends, they

> wore Italian tracksuits and the like, moving

> seamlessly from hip hip to house and I recall

> hearing similarities between them at the time. I

> didn't, however grow up amongst London hipsters ,

> Chicago house didn't make it up north and I was

> listening to rubbish at the time; a big part of me

> feels that I missed out! My apparently

> controversial statement was designed to elicit a

> response as I am interested in people's personal

> experience of this period, rather than a dry

> historical treatsie. Also, loved the 30's rap,

> amazing.


I grew up in South East London and hardly saw anyone wearing a pork pie hat. With regards to the London hipsters I guess everything in our culture was so organic. We didn't have marketing idiots like Hugo telling us what was good. The street fashion and music just evolved organically. I do remember the Italian tracksuits such as Fila and Sergio Tacchini but again their novelty had worn off by the mid eighties. Trainers were also better made. Thinking back, I guess it was our generation who created the current youth culture. We were the first to electronic video games, bmx, skateboarding, hip hop, street wear fashion, house music, etc.


These days, youngsters are spoon fed by marketing idiots and it's such a shame. You see groups of youngsters wearing identical clothing. What is wrong with having a bit of individuality? Music is far to commercial and lacking in creativity. And labels means nothing these days with the infiltration of marketing idiots.


@titch juicy - no, grabot made the fatal error when he said 'paid in full' laid the foundation for house.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...