Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Consultation is now open on the South of the borough event


Residents and local groups are being asked what kind of Council backed community event they would like to see in the south of the borough to celebrate the best of the area and bring people together. Do you want an event with music and dancing, or a Fair type event with stalls etc or a mixture of both or something totally different. Daytime or evening? Plheease let your opinion be heard by filling in the short form by 20th March>South of the Borough Event


Thanks

Renata

The budget is ?78,000 - sadly this is composed of ?24,000 council officer time to select an event/s and ?54,000 to fund any event/s.


I've suggested they use ?18,000 to fund the Dulwich Village School Crossing Patrols.


The remiander ask schools to host/run a literacy and numeracy festival open to the public. Sure lots of other ideas.

I'm lost on this one James. You're a councillor for East Dulwich why are you banging on about the Dulwich Village School Crossing Patrols? More prescient are the crossings on East Dulwich Grove in East Dulwich. Cars tear along East Dulwich Grove at significant speeds and fly over the crossings without noticing children waiting to cross: I reckon that this applies to one in three cars. I personally know parents who take a long detour along Lordship Lane to avoid East Dulwich Grove.


But that's by the by. Why hijack this thread with a non-sequitor?

Hi grabot,

The Dulwich Village ward councillors manuervred the ?18,000 of the ?30,000 allocated for CGS revenue (covering East Dulwich, College and Village wards) spend this coming year and into perpetuity to be forever allocated to Dulwich Village School Crossing Patrols. The patrols are needed.

So if no other funding is available reducing the Sotuh of the Borough event budget looking, begging for a home would be better than the extremely limited revenue funding we have.

Yeh, I realised that I had misused the word with hindsight. But then like you I liked the word prescient. It makes a mad kind of sense. A crossing with a sense of foreboding hanging over it. The crossing itself having an awareness of impending tragedy. Anyway, I don't get this James Barber guy. Is he a troll? He seems to provide satirical insight into the internal workings of a dysfunctional council without any relevance to the immediate point. In the past I remember a character called Dulwich Mum who provided satirical and somewhat irrelevant input. Is the councillor character a creation of the same person?


*Edited. I seem to lose the ability to use the English language when typing into a free text box.

Because of the Peckham Peace wall, a 'Love & Peace festival'.


Stands devoted to green/environmental issues/community groups etc.,

Local craft/trade stands,

A few live bands,

Childrens games,

Healthy food stalls and/or vegetarian,


Where you can sit on haystacks in the sunshine, on a sunday afternoon and drink pink lemonade!


So that everyone can come together and celebrate a traditional festival based on love & peace, in a

relaxed, chilled-out atmosphere.



I've posted the above suggestion on their website

:))

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi grabot,

> The Dulwich Village ward councillors manuervred

> the ?18,000 of the ?30,000 allocated for CGS

> revenue (covering East Dulwich, College and

> Village wards) spend this coming year and into

> perpetuity to be forever allocated to Dulwich

> Village School Crossing Patrols. The patrols are

> needed.

> So if no other funding is available reducing the

> Sotuh of the Borough event budget looking, begging

> for a home would be better than the extremely

> limited revenue funding we have.



I was under the impression that the ?18k comes from the Council mainstream traffic road safety budget and not from the CGS. Is that not the case then?

Just one day E-dealer. Just one day. Seems that this thread is disappearing back into council minutia anyway, so what does any of it matter? No doubt we will be informed that in 1650 Tessa Jowell passed a law banning groups of more than 50 persons gathering in south of the London Borough of Southwark for any activity that might, as judged by a panel of Calvinist scholars, be deemed to be pleasurable.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The remiander ask schools to host/run a literacy

> and numeracy festival open to the public.


I didn't see a winky emoticon here, so I assume this depressing idea was serious. Dear God, a festival should involve people enjoying themselves without the nicey-nicey covertly-finger-wagging 'learning can be fun' brigade spoiling it. If Southwark's schools can't ensure that children leave ther tender care with the basics of literacy and numeracy, please do something about it and don't ask the rest of us to pick up the tab when the money should rightly be spent on a big bash involving live music, something to smile about and a gigantic beer tent...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...